War2.ru Slogan
News: If your graphics are broken you can fix with the new ddraw version.
** Read how to install it here **


Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
Welcome to the forums! We're glad to have you here! :) You can register your account here, then feel free to introduce yourself in the Server.War2.ru board & let us know who you are on the server.

Warcraft Book of World Records 9620  93

Death Knight Posts: 3268 Karma: +130/-99 *********

Equinox

  • Death Knight
  • *********
  • *
  • Posts: 3268
    • View Profile
Re: Warcraft Book of World Records
« Reply #30 on: January 20, 2016, 02:17:33 AM »
I could beat that easily :)

with maphack, build hack and probably spell hack.
Axe Thrower Posts: 321 Karma: +43/-2 ****

Player

  • Axe Thrower
  • ****
  • Posts: 321
    • View Profile
Re: Warcraft Book of World Records
« Reply #31 on: January 23, 2016, 10:13:05 AM »
Updated swift's time vs 7 comps.
http://forum.war2.ru/index.php/topic,1864.0.html
Server Admin Death Knight Posts: 3871 Karma: +93/-13 *****

tk[as]

  • Server Admin
  • Death Knight
  • *****
  • *
  • Posts: 3871
    • View Profile
Re: Warcraft Book of World Records
« Reply #32 on: January 23, 2016, 11:56:30 AM »
take swift off #1    ... fk fastest. make gowBNE F separate from gowBNE EF
Death Knight Posts: 3584 Karma: +91/-3 retired, be in music section *********

shesycompany

  • Death Knight
  • *********
  • Posts: 3584
  • retired, be in music section
    • View Profile
Re: Warcraft Book of World Records
« Reply #33 on: January 23, 2016, 11:59:11 AM »
fastest would be more difficult? bae got a chicken. nice tunes 8)
Server Admin Death Knight Posts: 3871 Karma: +93/-13 *****

tk[as]

  • Server Admin
  • Death Knight
  • *****
  • *
  • Posts: 3871
    • View Profile
Re: Warcraft Book of World Records
« Reply #34 on: January 23, 2016, 12:01:34 PM »
the times should be recorded separately imo
Axe Thrower Posts: 321 Karma: +43/-2 ****

Player

  • Axe Thrower
  • ****
  • Posts: 321
    • View Profile
Re: Warcraft Book of World Records
« Reply #35 on: January 23, 2016, 12:45:06 PM »
take swift off #1    ... fk fastest. make gowBNE F separate from gowBNE EF
The committee will review your request.
Death Knight Posts: 3584 Karma: +91/-3 retired, be in music section *********

shesycompany

  • Death Knight
  • *********
  • Posts: 3584
  • retired, be in music section
    • View Profile
Re: Warcraft Book of World Records
« Reply #36 on: January 23, 2016, 08:30:15 PM »
u could actually slow his fastest down to ef playback speeds to see what the time amounts to.

if he does a  bne/ef....
im gonna say he should be faster to the ratio of his fastest.

yeah using a f and ef time is 2 dif things.
Server Admin Axe Thrower Posts: 415 Karma: +28/-2 *****

Warchief Lightbringer-

  • Server Admin
  • Axe Thrower
  • *****
  • *
  • Posts: 415
    • View Profile
Re: Warcraft Book of World Records
« Reply #37 on: January 24, 2016, 05:05:22 AM »
It is harder to win at F than EF vs comps. This is a fact.

Sent from my HM 1S using Tapatalk

Server Admin Death Knight Posts: 3871 Karma: +93/-13 *****

tk[as]

  • Server Admin
  • Death Knight
  • *****
  • *
  • Posts: 3871
    • View Profile
Re: Warcraft Book of World Records
« Reply #38 on: January 24, 2016, 10:20:26 AM »
i think it might be harder on F than EF if you've never played F  ... but if you've played both speeds with any sort of regularity i think they're both equally hard or easy imo.

a lot of it is just location, build order, build location, and timing
Sappers Posts: 832 Karma: +36/-3 ******

Swift

  • Sappers
  • ******
  • Posts: 832
    • View Profile
Re: Warcraft Book of World Records
« Reply #39 on: January 24, 2016, 12:18:26 PM »
TK, shut up about taking me off the world records or I'll go beat your shit times by several minutes vs 5/6 cpus on EF and F. <3

Also, I watched you try 5+ times vs 6 cpus on bne/f last night and you got crushed.

As for the F vs EF debate when it comes to playing computers, F is definitely harder and there's at least a couple reasons as to why this is so.

1) The CPU's actions are automatic, while human player's have to manually do each action as quick as they can. The faster the speed and the larger your base gets the less of it you can manage within a given amount of time, because everything is in motion -  and on Fastest battles are faster, wood chops faster, buildings finish faster, etc etc. So, in essence the faster the speed the more you're falling behind. Seeing as the speed difference doesn't effect computers, because their actions aren't delayed, you're inevitably falling more behind on F than you're on EF. You don't notice this to be true because you just assume you're losing on F because it's not your speed. So I encourage you to go ahead and play 7 CPU's at 1 or 2 speeds lower than EF and you should notice that the lower the speed gets the easier it gets.

2) CPU's don't have any real UC tactics, and humans do. We're able to exploit this advantage to a greater degree on EF, as it both far easier to UC on EF, there is more "time" to UC on EF, and there's many more practical UC maneuvers on EF than on F.

I'm sure there are other reasons why too. F is unarguably significantly harder. I'm top tier at both speeds, and playing 7 cpu's on BNE/EF is a cakewalk while 7 on BNE/F can be a challenge.
Axe Thrower Posts: 321 Karma: +43/-2 ****

Player

  • Axe Thrower
  • ****
  • Posts: 321
    • View Profile
Re: Warcraft Book of World Records
« Reply #40 on: January 24, 2016, 01:00:59 PM »
The committee has taken the following actions:
1. g3mini's gold mining record disqualified. He did not provide a response regarding exceeding the maximum number of gold mines able to be added through the built-in map editor.
2. F/EF has been split for the comp stomp time challenge records.
3. 1v5 comps was deemed 2ez and removed.
Sappers Posts: 832 Karma: +36/-3 ******

Swift

  • Sappers
  • ******
  • Posts: 832
    • View Profile
Re: Warcraft Book of World Records
« Reply #41 on: January 24, 2016, 01:29:06 PM »
Great, now I have two records.

Also, Player.. you intentionally hosted old/ef and made him 6 for the gold record so he couldn't mine.

I tried it on BNE with fixed order vs blue and came up 130 gold short of your record.  :'(

Crushed your wood record though!
Axe Thrower Posts: 321 Karma: +43/-2 ****

Player

  • Axe Thrower
  • ****
  • Posts: 321
    • View Profile
Re: Warcraft Book of World Records
« Reply #42 on: January 24, 2016, 01:50:38 PM »
Correct, that was the strat vs 6.  Proof on the wood!
Sappers Posts: 832 Karma: +36/-3 ******

Swift

  • Sappers
  • ******
  • Posts: 832
    • View Profile
Re: Warcraft Book of World Records
« Reply #43 on: January 24, 2016, 03:40:18 PM »
Give me your email or something I can send it to, I'll also send my World Record for BNE/EF
Server Admin Death Knight Posts: 3871 Karma: +93/-13 *****

tk[as]

  • Server Admin
  • Death Knight
  • *****
  • *
  • Posts: 3871
    • View Profile
Re: Warcraft Book of World Records
« Reply #44 on: January 24, 2016, 04:02:32 PM »
Omfg u lost too swift vs 6 comps stfu with that b.s. lol