Author Topic: TK is officially no longer a administer  (Read 3685 times)

Offline Warbux

  • Server Admin
  • Axe Thrower
  • *****
  • Posts: 332
    • View Profile
Re: TK is officially no longer a administer
« Reply #15 on: January 24, 2020, 03:38:03 AM »
I would also like the team /ignore to be finalized. If someone can do this, do it. The fact is that /dnd works all the time after it is written. But /ignore is disconnected while you are in the room. If you remove this problem - you can avoid conflicts. It will be possible to exclude some people specifically for themselves. When the community is large, one player is expelled. When the community is small, a person should be able to isolate himself from those who interfere with him.

i think this is a great idea an should really be worked on asap .. and i will keep bringing it up for you

Offline Warbux

  • Server Admin
  • Axe Thrower
  • *****
  • Posts: 332
    • View Profile
Re: TK is officially no longer a administer
« Reply #16 on: January 24, 2020, 03:39:35 AM »
iL generally does not want someone to be banned. He created this server so that players enjoy the game, and administrators help players. If this happens all the time, iL will listen to me. I communicate well with him, I speak Russian, in the end I’m not a passerby, I also have influence. And there is also a more influential person, convincing whom we will be able to influence the decision of iL.
You can be the main administrator, but you do not need to perform such drastic actions. Do not deprive players of their accounts. Remember that il gave you the right to bring good for this community. I don’t think that if you hadn’t taken the password from Tk, he would have gone to ban everyone.
very well said.. but the problem is if he gave tk back his admin name he would of made him self admin an continued to ban us

Offline Tolean

  • Axe Thrower
  • ****
  • Posts: 458
    • View Profile
Re: TK is officially no longer a administer
« Reply #17 on: January 24, 2020, 05:07:38 AM »
So you ban ppl because you think they will spam...
Good start.
So if you will think that smbd will act bad you will ban him...
Good job!

Offline fois

  • Grunt
  • ***
  • Posts: 233
  • Chicken
    • View Profile
Re: TK is officially no longer a administer
« Reply #18 on: January 24, 2020, 06:56:41 AM »
Where exactly did tk abuse his admin powers?

He made a poll and people decided something should be done about van, taking care of the issue wasn't his decision, players decided it with the poll.

You guys can't say the poll wasn't legitimate just because you didn't like the result, that's not how it works, sorry. If the result of the poll would have turned into vans favour then it would have been ok I guess?

You guys realize you are not against tk, you are against everyone who voted yes?

Offline Tolean

  • Axe Thrower
  • ****
  • Posts: 458
    • View Profile
Re: TK is officially no longer a administer
« Reply #19 on: January 24, 2020, 07:16:23 AM »
Looks like they don't realize. They cant see that this is a personal revenge and because of it they are acting very abusive against our community.
Only some weeks ago they all quit Forever and blah blah blah... And now they say they want to build our community. And some weeks later?
If you want to build then build. But this is very sad to watch.


Offline tk[as]

  • Server Admin
  • Dragon
  • *****
  • Posts: 5000
    • View Profile
Re: TK is officially no longer a administer
« Reply #20 on: January 24, 2020, 07:28:45 AM »
Burnt you did not build this community more than anybody else. You we're just the person that convinced everybody to leave battle and come here. That's not building a community. That is dividing a community. That is splitting a community. We have absolutely no idea whether it was the right decision or not. It could have been. But none of us know what would have happened if we stayed at Battlenet. A lot of us have tried building this community. Including myself. Recently you have been the one claiming you want to destroy the community, and actually taking actions that support that claim recently. I cannot get intouls  head.. but I would be extremely surprised if he sides with you on this good I have absolutely no idea what's going on but it is pretty crazy

Offline Harrywangs

  • Berserker
  • *****
  • Posts: 510
    • View Profile
Re: TK is officially no longer a administer
« Reply #21 on: January 24, 2020, 02:32:45 PM »
IL, can you please comment, in detail, the reason for your decision and I would also like you to justify your reasoning while addressing Xurnt's behavior and lack of sanity along with his poor behavior in the last 4 months.

We talk about TK being biased to Van but Clan Z supports Van and the things he says and now, we have 2 clan Z admins? Do you really think this is a good idea?

Again, I am requesting for myself, and the rest of the community, that you give us a detailed explanation of your reasoning.

This may be the end of Harrywangs as we know it. :(

Offline Tolean

  • Axe Thrower
  • ****
  • Posts: 458
    • View Profile
Re: TK is officially no longer a administer
« Reply #22 on: January 24, 2020, 02:37:24 PM »
Or he is afk for some reason, or this guys have smth against him...

Offline tk[as]

  • Server Admin
  • Dragon
  • *****
  • Posts: 5000
    • View Profile
Re: TK is officially no longer a administer
« Reply #23 on: January 24, 2020, 02:43:30 PM »
I know it might appear that way but I'm really not biased toward [z] .. trucks and Gino are great. I'm even completely ok with van acting decent and playing on the server. But hes not. It's an ongoing continuation of racism and hate speech.

Banx and burnt both are trying to defend Van's actions at the expense of the community. And they're not just defending his actions, they've (primarily burnt) been spreading lies/ harassing me ever since I enforced what the community collectively agreed on. That's where the conflict is.

Offline tk[as]

  • Server Admin
  • Dragon
  • *****
  • Posts: 5000
    • View Profile
Re: TK is officially no longer a administer
« Reply #24 on: January 24, 2020, 02:44:28 PM »
I do not believe iL will publicly address the issue. I'm not sure why, but that's the impression I am under.