"why the fuck are we deriving our morals from wild animals?"
we are? read again
"i think you ridicule arguments that refer to outside of society despite the fact thats EXACTLY what we should be doing.
in order to prove that its not "sociological construct", he pointed an example outside of society. do you know what this is? logic. "
we are not looking for a moral compass, but rather answering a question whether something is or isnt a sociological construct
does this question make sense? to me, not at all, but apparently feminists care... and clearly our guy, as he's some kind of behavioral psychologist or w/e. its probably a matter of research and fun for him, but for some reason this offends certain (WRONG) points of view. Which are largely triggered when confronted with facts. Evidence. Real world example... if its true, i dont care about lobsters. I care about ostriches, pigeons and geese