2821
General Discussion / Re: 'Murica thread
« on: May 14, 2015, 10:58:48 AM »I see so people jumping out of burning building and crushed under tons of concrete is "chill"?
Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X
Now I think you're mad.
Welcome to the forums! We're glad to have you here! :) You can register your account here, then feel free to introduce yourself in the Server.Warcraft2.online board & let us know who you are on the server.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Now I think you're mad.
2822
General Discussion / Re: scary news
« on: May 14, 2015, 10:53:48 AM »Thats what you call your little group that meets every sunday night behind the liquor store?
Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X
Scared?
2823
General Discussion / Re: 'Murica thread
« on: May 14, 2015, 10:53:19 AM »Ah i see, you didn't get any of that first responder recovery $$. Why you mad.
Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X
I'm not mad, 9/11 was chill.
2824
General Discussion / Re: 'Murica thread
« on: May 14, 2015, 10:48:00 AM »
[emoji35] [emoji107]
Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X
You mad bitch?
Sure I am, your not? You a terrorist [emoji46]
Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X
Cry about it you gay little baby.
2825
General Discussion / Re: scary news
« on: May 14, 2015, 10:47:38 AM »That troop should be summarily executed, for not tipping and being a war criminal.Ur welcome too for your freedom [emoji57]
Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X
Troops only protect corporate profits and should be summarily executed following speedy show trials from revolutionary worker's tribunals.
2826
General Discussion / Re: scary news
« on: May 14, 2015, 08:44:14 AM »
That troop should be summarily executed, for not tipping and being a war criminal.
2827
General Discussion / Re: "Iran, No Nuclear for YOU!" ?
« on: May 14, 2015, 08:43:30 AM »
i would say bush is being a giant fucktard with the iraq shit and is screwing himself but there's lot of campaign time left and he has a lot of money and all the other republican candidates are insanely shitty so
2828
General Discussion / Re: 'Murica thread
« on: May 14, 2015, 08:34:57 AM »
reminder that amerikkka literally drops bombs on black childrens and burns down black neighborhoods for fun http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/may/13/osage-avenue-bombing-philadelphia-30-years
2829
General Discussion / Re: 'Murica thread
« on: May 14, 2015, 08:34:28 AM »
[emoji35] [emoji107]
Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X
You mad bitch?
2832
General Discussion / Re: us 2016 elections thread (america ftw)
« on: May 08, 2015, 09:12:17 PM »his support for gun ownership is a little more than what you're describing - he even voted against the Brady bill, among other things (e.g., allowing people to carry guns on Amtrak trains - what could go wrong when you combine people and guns in an enclosed space that is travelling at 70 mph or whatever?). i also don't think the implication of the article is that one should prefer clinton over him. clinton is awful obviously, but i think this just goes to show that bernie isn't some savior of the left or anything (as you've been discussing with jon). my personal voting plan is to vote for bernie in the primaries as my way of telling the dems that i prefer a shift to the left for the party, and then abstaining from the actual election. i know it won't make a difference but w/edid you guys know about bernie's position on gun control? i didn't..... http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2015/05/bernie_sanders_on_guns_vermont_independent_voted_against_gun_control_for.html
yeah as the article says its largely a political thing due to demographics and constituency. to be honest i am very cynical about sanders and don't plan on supporting him with any kind of enthusiasm but these kinds of attacks seem like they're coming straight from cynical centrist dems. like he votes to shield gun manufacturers once and i'm supposed to be more upset about that than clinton being a complete sycophant to every industry but the firearm industry? its a bad vote and a bad position from every angle (even if you "support the second amendment" there's no good reason to shield gun manufacturers from liability) but in the big picture its kinda meh and seems like the kind of thing a candidate like clinton would love to use to bash him with
oh i didn't mean that article specifically, i didn't really read the article fully, i just meant in general it seemed like an angle i could see being disseminated and pushed by the clinton campaign and establishment democrats in general to damage him. like i said though it is a legitimate criticism, i could just see it being taken out of context to try and flank him on the "left", which is kind of absurd but that's why it would need to be taken out of context
2833
General Discussion / Re: us 2016 elections thread (america ftw)
« on: May 08, 2015, 09:08:55 PM »What if the left opposes gun control?
“Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary.”
– Karl Marx, March, 1850
This is why I support full gun ownership for the working class and the party organs representing them and the forced disarmament of the bourgeoisie and their proxies (the police).
2834
