no that's simplistic unthinking babble and has nothing to do with logic. logical thinking requires a little more nuance than that. for one thing, lobsters are predominately solitary in the wild lol. it isn't until we impact their behaviour that they'll start to form little hierarchies. that's the other thing, our impact on animal behaviour. this shit argument by your pseudo-intellectual hero doesn't even contemplate how we impact animal behaviour in significant ways, after destroying their natural environments for instance.
another question we should ask is why the fuck are we deriving our morals from wild animals? monkeys have hierarchies and it makes them prone to violence and continually fighting which each other. from this we can conclude that hierarchies aren't a good thing and need to be abolished.
if we start to derive our morals from animals we'll start flinging our shit at people and eating our shit as well, oh you already do that.