War2.ru Slogan
News: If your graphics are broken you can fix with the new ddraw version.
** Read how to install it here **


Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
Welcome to the forums! We're glad to have you here! :) You can register your account here, then feel free to introduce yourself in the Server.War2.ru board & let us know who you are on the server.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - BabyShark

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 41
1) General Discussion / Re: The Atheist Delusion
« on: Today at 05:46:10 AM »
@Antti_Kiviniemi



I can't believe it. I've been wrong this whole time. :(



That's the evidence I've been looking for my whole life. I've now seen proof that humans can turn into animals.



My whole existence, my purpose in life...everything...shattered, just like that.



I finally realize evolution is true. I can't deny evidence I see in front of my eyes.



And the worst part of all of this is blid's non-stop Islamophobia. I find it really offensive.



My first move will be to have a coccygectomy performed to help prove evolution.



I watched this video to help me know what it will be like:


Coccygectomy - YouTube



I just hope I don't get pelvic floor prolapse afterwards. I think the long recovery time and being unable to sit for a really long time will suck.



From http://tailbonedoctor.com/pain-and-pelvic-floor-prolapse-after-coccygectomy-tailbone-removal/:


Pelvic floor prolapse: Some of the pelvic floor muscle/tendon/ligaments do indeed attached to the coccyx, and certainly there have been case reports of people who have suffered from “pelvic floor prolapse” after coccygectomy, which is sagging of the pelvic floor.


What the Orthopaedic Surgeons have to say http://www.johnhardy.co.uk/Publish/information/Coccydynia.pdf


The coccyx has several important functions. It is the
insertion site for multiple muscles, ligaments, and
tendons. It provides weight bearing support to a
person in the seated position. Leaning back while sitting
leads to increased pressure on the coccyx



And sex after the surgery...might be painful...or impossible...but it's hard to know since there have been no studies done on sex in coccygectomy patients.


http://tailbonedoctor.com/painful-sex-after-coccygectomy-for-tailbone-pain/



 
While I'm having that done, I'll also ask to have my arms, legs, eyes, tongue, ears, nose, teeth and everything else I can survive without removed at the same time to prove that I don't really need them to survive. That will help everyone know that I used to be a monkey.







These images are proof that the mother and father of these humans are pictured below with their siblings, a nice family portrait:





We need to get the truth out there.

2) General Discussion / Re: The Atheist Delusion
« on: January 20, 2018, 02:26:02 PM »
Either you do not know what vestigial means or you do not understand that the tailbone is a fully functioning and necessary part of human anatomy.

You should do a bit of reading about what the tailbone is for.

Being unable to learn new information is a drastic fault and sign of very low levels of thinking. It's also unwise to accept everything you're told as "fact" when it is obviously not the case.

Yes, I understand that you were taught that by evolutionist teaching, but that information is scientifically inaccurate.

There is no evidence anywhere in the world that the human tailbone is a remnant of an ancestral tail.

Loss of function has been observed in real life in some cases, but this is not progress. It's a downward regression, the opposite of what's required for evolution to go from molecules-to-man.

New information and new instructions for new body parts and organs being added to the gene pool by natural selection has never been observed.

3) General Discussion / Re: The Atheist Delusion
« on: January 20, 2018, 03:20:12 AM »
The go-to tactics of liberals losing arguments are:
  • name calling
  • insults
  • false accusations
  • call for torture/death/imprisonment of person who disagrees with them
  • complain that the post is too long**

You are angry because you have no evidence to support your religion of evolution, so you retort with nonsense.

4) General Discussion / Re: The Atheist Delusion
« on: January 20, 2018, 12:54:10 AM »
>animal can turn into another kind of animal.

you have a strange idea of what evolution is

You can see the "evolution tree" diagram above, and read the evolutionist view of dolphins that claims they are related to cows and maybe hippos (but they have no idea, it's all fairy tale telling so they have to leave it open so it can be easily changed at any time).

The evolution view teaches that life organized itself (impossible, never observed) following the explosion of nothing (impossible, never observed), and that single-celled organisms turned into more and more advanced life forms over millions and millions and millions of years (hoping that people won't scoff at the impossibility when more and more and more time is added).

Yes, that requires animals turning from one kind of animal to another kind of animal slowly with each successive generation.

New information is required to be added in order for this to happen.

This addition of new information and new instructions for new parts HAS NEVER BEEN OBSERVED.

I repeat.

HAS

NEVER,

EVER

been observed.

EVER.

Believing it did is not science.

5) General Discussion / Re: The Atheist Delusion
« on: January 20, 2018, 12:48:21 AM »
why do we have vestigial structures like the tailbone?

The tailbone isn't vestigial.

The tailbone is a very important part of the human anatomy, and is the anchor for tendons, ligaments, and muscles, including those that connect to the anus. The tailbone supports a person in sitting position.

The spine has to end somewhere.

None of this is evidence that human beings "used to have a tail" or "used to be monkeys".

The concept of vestigial organs does not prove evolution anyways. Evolution requires the input of NEW information, NEW systems.

LOSING organs, LOSING function is the OPPOSITE of evolution!

Losing function and losing parts can happen. This is found in real science. But it isn't evidence that one kind of animal can turn into another kind of animal.

An example of losing information that some tout as "evolution observed" (but is actually the opposite) would be if some beetles are produced with wings missing due to a genetic mutation on a windy island. The mutant beetles in this case would be less likely to be blown away, so a population could potentially lose the genetic information for wings this way in a particular environment.

This is not a gain of information. A loss is devolution, not evolution.

For molecules to become man, you need significant, massive amounts of information for new parts, new organs, new instructions ADDED.

Information being lost or removed is the opposite of evolution.

And what's included in science is only variation within a kind of animal. You have beetles at the beginning and beetles at the end. It is still the same kind of animal, but information has been lost.

In most environments, not having wings would make one an easier target for predators, since you can't fly away.

Vestigial organs or lost information would not show evolution, but rather devolution (as the law of entropy, which also renders the entire evolutionary fable impossible, would predict).

The claim that a vestigial organ (even if you had provided an example of one) would prove evolution is similar to saying a spare tire found in the back of a pickup truck proves that the car made itself.

Creatures do show remarkable, God-given ability to adapt (long hair, short hair, coloring, size, etc.) within kinds. Variation within kinds happens. That's scientific.

What is not scientific or observed and never has been, is one kind of animal changing into another kind of animal. This does not happen. Hyraxes don't become horses. Cows don't become dolphins. Fish don't become lizards.

Believing these kinds of impossible claims is just as religious as believing someone really smart and powerful made them, although I'd say logic is heavily on the side of intelligently designed, amazing organisms composed of countless machines operating together in beautiful harmony having been designed rather than poofing into existence from nothingness by accident.

6) General Discussion / Re: The Atheist Delusion
« on: January 20, 2018, 12:27:51 AM »
animals turning from one kind of animal to another kind of animal, such as cows to dolphins and whales.

lol i dont really read babyshark posts closely anymore, just saw this and rofld


Not sure why you're laughing here, since you are the one that purports to believe this.

Origin of Dolphins

It is generally believed that all marine mammals evolved from land based ancestors around 50-60 million years ago. Of all the marine mammals the dolphins are among those most adapted to an aquatic way of life. All cetaceans were well diversified around 50 million years ago. It is widely accepted in scientific circles that both the baleen and toothed whales shared a common ancestor, now extinct. The closest living relatives of dolphins today are the even toed ungulates such as camels and cows with the humble hippopotamus being the closest living relative. The origin of dolphins and the origin of whales in general is the subject of much debate. Did they evolve from an ancient ungulate order or did they diverge along with the hippopotamus from another lesser known group of animals land based ungulates?

(from http://www.whalewatchwestcork.com/dolphin-research.html)

If evolution is such "fact", why do they have no clue about it and why are they still debating these ridiculous things amongst themselves?

The entire "evolutionary tree" is a fantasy.



All we observe are the "points" of these diagrams. The entire "tree" is missing. No evidence, observational, fossil, or otherwise.

Yet it is taught as fact in most public schools, museiums, textbooks, TV programs, and that's why you believe it's fact.

You have no evidence to support these facts, and neither do any of the evolution scientists.

These ideas have been shredded to oblivion by real science, yet the idea is embraced with religious fervor, not because of science, but because people who love to live for their lusts and pleasures do not wish to be confronted by a God who judges wickedness, and it gives them an excuse to sin.

7) General Discussion / Re: The Atheist Delusion
« on: January 20, 2018, 12:08:38 AM »
I do not believe that one kind of animal can turn into another kind of animal. I do not believe that cows turn into dolphins or that frogs can turn into princes in real life.Why would you believe that one kind of animal can turn into another kind of animal? (not science, it's religion) Bring out your best scientific evidence. Let's have it.

dogs used to be wolves. therefore evolution is real

I'm going to assume that you did as requested, and brought out your BEST evidence that one kind of animal can turn into another kind of animal.

I specifically said repeatedly that variation within a kind of animal does not count as evidence that one kind of animal can turn into another kind of animal.

I don't know of anyone who does not understand that dogs and wolves are the same KIND of animal.





Dogs and wolves can interbreed and produce viable and fertile young. They are the same KIND of animal.

Let's talk about the "evolution" of dogs into various artificially selected mutants.

The mutant dogs would be culled by natural selection. They are not an improvement over the natural wolf-looking dog type.

Bulldog
- severe underbite (inferior to healthy bite), jaw too short for teeth, teeth grow in crooked, are prone to decay
- wrinkled skin prone to bacterial and yeast infections
- short fur, would freeze to death in most places
- short, deformed legs and joints render them handicapped and unable to outrun enemies or chase prey (72% have hip dysplasia)
- can't give birth normally (80-95% of bulldogs are born by C-section)
- severe breathing problems due to deformed muzzle, narrow nostrils and windpipe, unable to cool themselves properly in hot weather and are prone to collapse from heatstroke
- many have eyelashes that grow inwards and scrape the dogs' corneas
- many come with cleft lip, abnormal eye formation, and hydrocephalus
- many have a tail so tightly wound that poop gets stuck in it, and the tail needs to be amputated

I personally think it's cruel to intentionally breed a dog that will endure a lifetime of suffering from being this mutated and deformed. It's sick. This is not progress. This is not an improvement from the genetically diverse natural dog body shape found in wild dogs and wolves.

People who have studied bulldogs concede that the breed cannot be saved from severely damaged health without infusing new blood and genetic diversity into the sickly and thin gene pool. See http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-36916431 and http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/english-bulldog-health-problems-inbreeding-pedigree-dog-breeds-breeders-a7160041.html and https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/animalia/wp/2016/08/02/why-breeding-bulldogs-is-borderline-inhumane/?utm_term=.27456205c9d3.

There is information LOST, not gained. To "evolve" upwards, you need NEW information ADDED. Information LOST is thinning the genes, and you end up with less diversity, not more.

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/bulldogs-are-dangerously-unhealthy-there-may-not-be-enough-diversity-their-genes-save-them-180959963/



Dachshund

    Dachshunds have fragile backs. Because of their dwarfism (big dog, short legs), Dachshunds are genetically predisposed to have faulty spines, which can become injured when handled incorrectly, or sometimes for no apparent reason. Certain activities can be hard on a Dachshund’s back and can even result in a paralyzing disk rupture:

• Going up and down stairs
• Jumping off furniture
• Even running quickly around a sharp corner.

Get ready to carry your dachshund up and down the stars!

(Dachshund info from http://www.dummies.com/pets/dogs/common-characteristics-of-dachshunds/)

Even my beloved German Shepherd breed has a less genetic diversity than non-purebred dogs, and the American bloodlines have also been damaged beyond belief. The first picture in this post is of a German Shepherd from European working bloodlines (much healthier than American bloodlines, but still have genetic issues).


German Shepherd (American Show Bloodlines)

Someone decided that the breed should have a sloping back. For whatever reason. There's no intelligence there. But the dog has been intentionally bred to be crippled.

German shepherd show line - YouTube You can see this GSD puppy has deformed legs and an abnormal walk and gait.

German Shepherd Back Legs Problem - YouTube This young GSD needs a wheelchair.

These dogs are purposely bred for a certain "look" and the breed ends up deformed and sickly and crippled.

Artificial breeding is clearly NOT making dogs stronger, better, faster, or improved in any way. Nor is any new information being added, which is REQUIRED for evolution to "progress" in an upward direction.

I was asking for evidence that a fish can produce a wolf or that a monkey can produce a human being or that a cow can produce a whale.

Bonus if you can prove that nothing exploded billions of years or if you can prove that life originated from non-living material or if you can prove that an imagined self-replicating molecule (non-existent supposed predecessor to living cells). Evolutionists have a lot of religious faith in these things.

Creationism is religious, sure, especially if you specify who that Creator is. But evolutionism is also religious.

If you don't think so, show me the evidence. So far, none has been produced.

8) Server.War2.ru / Re: Player F Approved for W2 Server Breeding Program
« on: January 19, 2018, 07:29:44 PM »
You have no idea who you're talking to.

I've achieved Rank 8 in Tetris, buddy.

9) Server.War2.ru / Re: Player F Approved for W2 Server Breeding Program
« on: January 19, 2018, 05:41:53 PM »
Are you a candidate?

We are tayloring the breeding program specifically for ensuring the future success of the Warcraft 2 server, borrowing knowledge from successful breeders of livestock, found at https://peda.net/kenya/css/subjects/agriculture/form-3/lsab/sobs.

I created a flow chart to help determine your suitability for the program.

1. Proven fertility > proceed to 6
2. Unproven fertility > proceed to 4
3. Infertile > disqualified

4. Take fertility tests, read here https://www.webmd.com/infertility-and-reproduction/guide/male-fertility-tests#1 or 5
5. Prove fertility the old fashioned way on a willing volunteer

6. Level of Warcraft 2 performance adequate (Tiers 1-4, some 5, 6 may be considered, but not for foundation stock) > proceed to 9
7. Inadequate Warcraft 2 performance > proceed to 8

8. Study Warcraft 2 strategy here http://classic.battle.net/war2/gs/index.shtml, study U8's campaigns here https://www.twitch.tv/videos/220278890

9. Temperament prone to fits of rage and verbal attacks on other players > proceed to 12
10. Temperament confident, playful, fun, stable personality type > proceed to 14
11. Temperament unsure of temperamental suitability > proceed to 13

12. Read about anger issues here https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/evolution-the-self/200807/what-your-anger-may-be-hiding, try calming music, exercise, relaxation techniques, deep breathing, talking it through with a good friend or counsellor

13. Take a temperament test, such as this one http://www.grandin.com/behaviour/principles/assessment.temperament.html

14. Age over 40 > disqualified (Children with fathers aged 40 or older are more than five times as likely to have an autism spectrum disorder than children fathered by men aged under 30. https://yourfertility.org.au/for-men/age/)
15. Age under 25 > disqualified (You may be a candidate for breeding within a future program, come back in a decade)
16. Age 26 - 39 > proceed to 17

17. Take IQ Test here http://test.mensa.no/ IQ test result over 100 > proceed to 21
18. IQ Test result 70-99 > proceed to 20
19. IQ Test result 40-69 (the majority of forum users most likely land in this group) > disqualified

20. Disqualified.
21. You are a candidate, Collect a sample for inspection. Follow these procedures: https://www.fertilityauthority.com/articles/collecting-semen-sample

If your sample passes inspection, you will be contacted for possible entry into the elite program.






10) Server.War2.ru / Player F Approved for W2 Server Breeding Program
« on: January 19, 2018, 04:12:55 PM »
Player F approved for stud service.

11) General Discussion / Re: The Atheist Delusion
« on: January 18, 2018, 03:14:17 PM »
Lol

It's incredibly easy to answer.

I'm not at my PC atm. I'm out n about n only have my phone. And I'm not always in a mood to have conversations with hateful Christophobic heterophobic bigots.

But when that mood strikes me, I'll elaborate on how grossly uninformed you are about anatomy.

The tailbone is not vestigial.

12) Server.War2.ru / Re: Ways to cheat in war2.
« on: January 18, 2018, 02:07:17 PM »
I didn't say I was talking about myself either but if there is a baby you better not be cheating and we need to figure out who the father is and get some child payments set up pronto.

I think I'd X out all those impotent and infertile first.

Mousey you're a genius.

That's how we will re-populate the server! It's so obvious I can't believe no one suggested it before. We need to be the broodmares of the W2 Endangered Species Breeding Program. PM Terra and Jade.

I wouldn't bother with anyone not of proven fertility, especially with how costly it is to ship frozen semen.




13) Server.War2.ru / Re: Ways to cheat in war2.
« on: January 18, 2018, 12:28:04 PM »
Are you of proven fertility, though, Claw?

I suspect you shoot blanks, if what makes up your sheet stains matches what proceeds from your brains.

14) Server.War2.ru / Re: Ways to cheat in war2.
« on: January 18, 2018, 12:21:06 PM »
Now, now Sepi. You and I both know we never had sex.

15) Server.War2.ru / Re: Ways to cheat in war2.
« on: January 18, 2018, 10:49:10 AM »
I agree with you that Player A is a slimeball, but I don't think it's fair to blame Player C.

Player B's girlfriend was a bitch anyway, and I really don't think Player B was that upset about it.

Player B's W2 performance didn't diminish any, from what I could tell.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 41