War2.ru Slogan
News: New responsive forum theme available! Click here to switch! More info here!


Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
Welcome to the forums! We're glad to have you here! :) You can register your account here, then feel free to introduce yourself in the Server.War2.ru board & let us know who you are on the server.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - marx was right

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 199
1) General Discussion / Re: The Atheist Delusion
« on: January 20, 2018, 04:13:51 PM »
Either you do not know what vestigial means or you do not understand that the tailbone is a fully functioning and necessary part of human anatomy.
you do realize here have been people who've had their tailbone removed with little issue? lol. like i said, learn when to stop typing.

2) General Discussion / Re: nba 2017-2018
« on: January 20, 2018, 01:19:21 PM »

trash franchise ruined further by MJ

3) General Discussion / Re: The Atheist Delusion
« on: January 20, 2018, 10:26:24 AM »
when your first sentence starts with denying clear facts
"The tailbone isn't vestigial."

and believe i'm going to read the rest of your inane worthless babble.

4) General Discussion / Re: The Atheist Delusion
« on: January 20, 2018, 02:54:45 AM »
learn when to stop typing

5) General Discussion / Re: The Atheist Delusion
« on: January 20, 2018, 12:42:47 AM »
>animal can turn into another kind of animal.

you have a strange idea of what evolution is

6) General Discussion / Re: nba 2017-2018
« on: January 19, 2018, 07:10:06 PM »
quicker jump shooting pops plus it trains range as secondary.. then again if  you're mostly training 7 footers it'll be slow to train jump shooting and even slower to train range. probably stick with 1on1 unless u want more JS and range pops.

7) General Discussion / Re: nba 2017-2018
« on: January 19, 2018, 06:35:48 PM »
it's easy. decide what you want to train in the future, bigs or smalls, train 1on1 and any other easy 2-position training like jump shooting and rebounding. since most of your trainees are taller players you'd probably want to train bigs in the future. so when u think u got enough training out of Elroy to make him valuable put him on the market.

8) General Discussion / Re: nba 2017-2018
« on: January 19, 2018, 05:50:04 PM »
i might do 2 position training. it'll make it easier to win games for me, plus develop my bench. if the training seems too slow i might have to rethink that, but i think it'll be ok.

9) General Discussion / Re: nba 2017-2018
« on: January 19, 2018, 01:54:31 PM »
One on One for PG / SG
Georges-Henri Valois ↑popped↑ in Jump Shot from sensational to tremendous .
Billy Moon ↑popped↑ in Driving from prominent to prolific .
Brian Forrester ↑popped↑ in Jump Shot from prominent to prolific .
Brian Forrester ↑popped↑ in Handling from proficient to prominent .
Brian Forrester ↑popped↑ in Driving from proficient to prominent .
Kerry Fournier ↑popped↑ in Handling from prolific to sensational .

10) General Discussion / Re: nba 2017-2018
« on: January 19, 2018, 12:04:45 PM »


whoa

11) Comradely & Loving Discussion Zone / Re: WOMEN'S RIGHTS and FEMINISM
« on: January 19, 2018, 12:04:13 PM »
 you're the one that thinks these shit arguments that sound like people are making them high off their asses are good. 'bro what about the lobsters tho'

12) Comradely & Loving Discussion Zone / Re: WOMEN'S RIGHTS and FEMINISM
« on: January 19, 2018, 11:22:39 AM »
you're drooling again

13) Comradely & Loving Discussion Zone / Re: WOMEN'S RIGHTS and FEMINISM
« on: January 19, 2018, 10:03:00 AM »
no it's not a solid argument dumbshit, that's the point. it's a very bad one your roommate makes after taking a huge hit off his bong.

15) Comradely & Loving Discussion Zone / Re: WOMEN'S RIGHTS and FEMINISM
« on: January 19, 2018, 08:58:05 AM »
"why the fuck are we deriving our morals from wild animals?"
we are? read again

"i think you ridicule arguments that refer to outside of society despite the fact thats EXACTLY what we should be doing.
in order to prove that its not "sociological construct", he pointed an example outside of society. do you know what this is? logic. "
we are not looking for a moral compass, but rather answering a question whether something is or isnt a sociological construct
does this question make sense? to me, not at all, but apparently feminists care... and clearly our guy, as he's some kind of behavioral psychologist or w/e. its probably a matter of research and fun for him, but for some reason this offends certain (WRONG) points of view. Which are largely triggered when confronted with facts. Evidence. Real world example... if its true, i dont care about lobsters. I care about ostriches, pigeons and geese


 looking at lobsters which only become hierarchical after we've 'constructed' an environment for that behaviour is the worst example to use when trying to invent an argument that our hierarchical structures aren't socially invented. now no real scientist agrees with peterson on anything, simple because he's wrong and argues against facts. he's a petulant moron who makes money off bigger drooling morons who want to hear him confirm their prejudices.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 199