War2.ru Slogan
News: All hail our wise & benevolent admins!

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
Welcome to the forums! We're glad to have you here! :) You can register your account here, then feel free to introduce yourself in the Server.War2.ru board & let us know who you are on the server.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - CumSavorer4385

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 201
31) General Discussion / Re: 'Murica thread
« on: December 21, 2017, 07:06:31 PM »
But there are also some concerning new factual developments. For one thing, “though December is normally rather quiet for military drills, the US this month brought in a record number of stealth aircraft to train up on an air war against North Korea.” Ten days ago it was reported that China has begun to plan new refugee camps along the North Korean border, suggesting it sees war as a real possibility. China has also apparently distributed printed advice for how to survive a nuclear attack to residents along the border. Business Insider says that “the US and China are preparing for all hell to break loose in North Korea.”

32) General Discussion / Re: 'Murica thread
« on: December 21, 2017, 07:05:32 PM »
America is drawing up plans for a “bloody nose” military attack on North Korea to stop its nuclear weapons programme, The Telegraph understands.  The White House has “dramatically” stepped up preparation for a military solution in recent months amid fears diplomacy is not working, well-placed sources said. Three sources – two former US officials familiar with current thinking and a third figure in the administration – confirmed military options were being worked up. The Pentagon is trying to find options that would allow them to punch the North Koreans in the nose

Considering the recent Glasnost-esque opening of this forum, I thought I would bump the thread for further discussion in the new, more open forum environment.

34) General Discussion / Re: Leftism thread for forum.war2.ru (Communism itt)
« on: December 20, 2017, 07:34:04 PM »

35) General Discussion / Re: The Music thread!
« on: December 20, 2017, 07:31:36 PM »
8$+(12 pack) whatever here under 10..its always been this price here..since 97 when i worked at a gas station, 13+ whatever at walmart for a case(24)..the full flavored red is like on levels of pbr

this is white genocide

36) General Discussion / Re: 'Murica thread
« on: December 20, 2017, 07:19:31 PM »
american juries are fucking retarded

I'm not watching this

lol i just found out this little nugget

The judge did not allow jurors to hear about an etching on the dust cover of the rifle Brailsford used to shoot Shaver, which said "You're f--ked," because he felt it was prejudicial.

37) General Discussion / Re: The Music thread!
« on: December 20, 2017, 06:32:45 PM »
i remember when a 12 pack of beast light was only 5 bucks...fuck you obama!!!!!

You haven't expressed any opinions other than you hate me and want me dead.

This is clearly and plainly false. You lie, again. Bad Christian.

39) General Discussion / Re: anti-capitalism thread
« on: December 19, 2017, 08:14:50 PM »
At the same time as the plan cuts back on deductions for individual homeowners, it exempts real estate investors from a new 30% limit on interest deductibility for businesses. “This tax plan would turn America from a nation of property owners into a nation of tenants renting from private equity-backed landlords,” argues Vishal Garg, CEO of Better Mortgage, an online mortgage lender focused on Millennials. “Why should corporate landlords get the deduction if your consumer homebuyer can't?”

40) Play Pen-itentiary / Re: on my recent ban
« on: December 19, 2017, 08:08:01 PM »
FALSE. I'm 33 years old and had never in my life, on TV, movies, newspaper, radio, or word-of-mouth heard or seen this being addressed. The same is true for most adults in North America. The vast majority is not talking about FGM and certainly not the liberal-controlled media.

The second (first complete) sentence is a non-sequitur. Assuming you are being honest (based on past experience and common sense, I don't think you are), the fact that you have not seen such things being addressed does not mean they haven't been. Simply that you are unaware of them. There is a whole universe of things you are likely unaware of yet are true nonetheless. The next statement "the same is true for most adults in North America" is a claim made without a shred of evidence behind it. The last sentence is also not substantiated by any facts, only conspiratorial raving against the "liberal-controlled media."

FALSE. I believe in human rights for all people of all ages of all appearances of all places.

This is not what he said. The fact that you changed "fight for women generally" into a generalized "human rights for all people" statements not only does not prove his statement false, it further his point - you are not able to say unequivocally that you fight for women specifically, on issues that primarily concern and affect women.

FALSE. I have addressed many issues, not only FGM. Read through the posts to see that many different topics are discussed. I am addressing any and all obstacles that people have perceived or believed in their minds that block them from seeing the love of Jesus and believing in Jesus Christ as Savior. If someone wants to teach another that the earth is round, they have to first destroy the belief that the earth can be flat. Teaching a round earth to a flat-earth believer is not done from hate or bigotry, but out of a desire to teach the truth. The truth is not hate. Facts are not hate.

You've addressed other women's issues besides FGM and issues (supposedly) relating to fundamentalist Islam? I looked through your recent posts and could not find any examples. Could you point me towards one? Until you do, I will assume you are continuing to bear false witness.

I welcome points of view and discussion, from all viewpoints and people. Personal attacks and mislabelling do nothing to promote and increase understanding. I would love to be able to focus on having an actual discussion with Ze_Saint, but being attacked from all sides non-stop by hateful people spewing insults, lies, and labels is creating a very hostile environment of hate that tends to make civil conversation obsolete.

If this is true, why did you not only lie about my beliefs, but also refused to apologize for doing so when this lying was called to your attention? Again you are disingenuous. If one were less charitable than myself, they may say your actions on this forum are consistent with the actions of a liar.

As for scripture, as William Shakespeare said, "even the devil can quote scripture for his own use." You are not only not fooling anybody, but any serious Christian of integrity and charity would be appalled by your hypocrisy. Honestly, truly sad. I can only wonder what led you to be this way and pray that you are healed.

41) Play Pen-itentiary / Re: on my recent ban
« on: December 19, 2017, 07:08:50 PM »
it's blindingly obvious that tons of feminists are aware of and against female genital mutilation, whereas babyshark does not care whatsoever to fight for women generally, and is only focused on the single issue of female genital mutilation specifically, because she can use it to attack muslims. 

babyshark throws around words like "love" and "joy" but only to decree that muslim people dont have any and wont have any unless they worship christ.  she breaks with hundreds of millions of people claiming the islam religion worldwide who dont wish harm on women to tell them that theyre not real muslims, because she has an extremist interpretation of islam in common with isis.

she makes mean and dishonest interpretations of other peoples motives.  she judges others, constantly.  she has very little generosity in her.  she spends 1% of her posts talking about christ's love and the other 99% talking about the danger of muslims.  she's become a living instrument of fear, and she likes it, and feeds it by poring over anti-muslim websites and with a constant stream of hate videos.

she calls herself a christian

Sad that this is what Christianity means for millions of Americans.

42) Play Pen-itentiary / Re: on my recent ban
« on: December 19, 2017, 09:10:12 AM »
babyshark doesn't respond when she gets called out on her lies or admit she's wrong when she gets destroyed in an argument. she'll ignore and continue spamming videos.

for instance, she lashed out at feminists because she believed they were being silent on the issue of FGM, i easily found links showing that there plenty of feminists that have protested and are very vocal on the topic of FGM. all it would take to find that out is a simple google search.  this shows she has no interest in the truth, she lies and is disingenuous.. now why do we want a liar and a disingenuous person, who has abused her powers multiple times already, as a mod?


43) Play Pen-itentiary / Re: on my recent ban
« on: December 19, 2017, 09:09:36 AM »
Yeah IDK. Lots of reasons I guess. The one constant tends to be each side pointing at the other side and saying "it's their fault beacuse...."

This discussion seems to be made up exclusively of people trying to destroy the other's argument. What can we agree on?

Let's start with something easy: chopping up girl's bits. Absolutely abhorrent. Anybody disagree? No, of course not.

How about burning women alive "at the stake". Anybody like that? No? Ok, we are doing well.

How about racism? Anybody here (apart from Claw, obviously) think that people should be treated differently based solely on their genetic makeup/skin color? No takers? Cool.

Let's try freedom of religion. Does anybody here think that people should be persecuted based on the God they choose to worship? hmmm... well... ... no, I guess - as long as they don't do the bad stuff like chopping/burning/hating etc.

Please feel free to reply with your thoughts on these questions.

Please do not reply with what you think any other person/group's attitude towards these questions is .... that path leads to the dark side!

The problem isn't that people can't disagree civilly, the problem is that BS argues in bad faith and is intellectually dishonest. Instead of engaging people's positions she lies about them, passive aggressively insults them, spams discussions with walls of Quran quotes and racist YouTube videos, and worst of all, uses her position as a moderator to bully people. It is a travesty and a joke that she is a mod, frankly.

Can you or can you not articulate what you actually believe? Do you not know? Are you scared to tell people?

No, I already said why I won't complete your questionnaire, because you are deceitful and argue in bad faith. You have not actually engaged with any of my expressed opinions, instead you lie about what I believe and argue with that, and refuse to apologize for lying. You are a bad faith actor in this discussion and until you acknowledge and apologize for your lies I will not engage you except to point out your falsehoods. Cheers.


You seem to have difficulty articulating your beliefs, so I decided to help you out.

This is plainly disingenuous. I have expressed no difficulty articulating my beliefs and you haven't even expressed an inability to understand them (instead you've evaded and ignored arguments). In addition, the idea that you could articulate my beliefs better than myself is plainly ludicrous, and this is made obvious by the absurd nature of the beliefs you attributed to me. You claim to be a Christian yet you lie about what I believe and, when confronted about this, rather than apologizing and seeking to atone for your sin, you turn it into a virtue. This is very unbecoming behavior for anyone, let alone a forum moderator, and is neither honest nor conducive to discussion.

I will not respond to your questionnaire until at least you admit that you lied about my beliefs and then lied again when confronted, and then I will consider it. This post was obviously made in bad faith and, as someone who is only interested in intelligent and productive discussion with intellectually honest and ethical parties.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 201