You shouldn't even be allowed to make this thread unless you vote, and vote for Sanders.
voting apathy is dangerous
making excuses for your laziness
voting apathy is dangerous
Voting is dangerous because its an implicit acceptance and approval of the system.
it is laziness, it's going out of your daily routine to go to a place to vote. you just made it sound like a paper shows up at your house or something and u just got to mark it and send it back. you actually got to leave the house.
lol @ preselected by the ruling class
voting apathy is dangerous
Voting is dangerous because its an implicit acceptance and approval of the system.
and buying video games and bougeious food isn't?
voting apathy is dangerous
Voting is dangerous because its an implicit acceptance and approval of the system.
and buying video games and bougeious food isn't?
Arguably but I'm not here sitting here telling people they're dumbasses for either playing video games or not playing video games. All of what you're posting here is subreformist lifestyleism based on liberal individualist mythology though.
no, voting has nothing to do with individualism. like protests that fought for an 8 hr workday, better wages , woman's suffrage, voting can do the same thing.
voting apathy is why morons get into office on low voting turnout rates, it's why canada has harpercons in office when only 30% of the country actually gave a shit to vote, now realizing their mistake record turnout rates in alberta now ousting the cons.
lol @ preselected by the ruling class. everyone knows that candidates are selected by the people in a liberal democracy!!!!
no, voting has nothing to do with individualism. like protests that fought for an 8 hr workday, better wages , woman's suffrage, voting can do the same thing.
lmfao.voting apathy is why morons get into office on low voting turnout rates, it's why canada has harpercons in office when only 30% of the country actually gave a shit to vote, now realizing their mistake record turnout rates in alberta now ousting the cons.
voting is a waste of time in canada too but even moreso in the US because the electoral system in the US is rigged to never allow more than two parties and just due to the facts of political economy those two parties are always going to be practically uniform in policy outside of minor superficial differences crafted for political gain. you must actually think it matters if a republican or a democrat is president lol.
no one is getting pre selected, you just need to be wealthy to run a proper campaign and i guess are wealthy people are scum or completely out of touch with reality.
yea but bernie isn't a typical democrat even though he's running as one. the guy at the very least works to chip away at the archaic american mentality of socialism being a bad word.
that's quite different from being pre selected.. like what if a rich guy who wasn't a total dumbass ran?? like bernie???????no one is getting pre selected, you just need to be wealthy to run a proper campaign and i guess are wealthy people are scum or completely out of touch with reality.
Uh yeah that's the whole point???? The system is set up so that those are the only people who can possibly win an election.
that's quite different from being pre selected.. like what if a rich guy who wasn't a total dumbass ran?? like bernie???????no one is getting pre selected, you just need to be wealthy to run a proper campaign and i guess are wealthy people are scum or completely out of touch with reality.
Uh yeah that's the whole point???? The system is set up so that those are the only people who can possibly win an election.
is sanders even that wealthy? i mean compared to the other candidatesSanders, besides being a lot more flawed than you might expect, is not a preselected candidate. But because he's not he represents no threat to Hillary and supporting him will accomplish nothing.
it is laziness, it's going out of your daily routine to go to a place to vote. you just made it sound like a paper shows up at your house or something and u just got to mark it and send it back. you actually got to leave the house.
lol @ preselected by the ruling class
voting is a waste of time in canada too but even moreso in the US because the electoral system in the US is rigged to never allow more than two parties and just due to the facts of political economy those two parties are always going to be practically uniform in policy outside of minor superficial differences crafted for political gain. you must actually think it matters if a republican or a democrat is president lol.
bernie's simply a tiny step in the right direction.
supporting the right of israel's existence doesn't equate to wanting palestinians dead.
Israel was literally founded on Palestinian genocide and has never ceased ethnically cleansing Palestineamerica was also founded on genocide, what do you want to do about it now?
in its entire existence and its entire existence as a "Jewish state" in such territory arguably necessitates a genocidal posture.the average palestinian wants to live in peace with israel, it's the hate mongering and war mongering israeli regime that needs to be ousted
america was also founded on genocide, what do you want to do about it now?
the average palestinian wants to live in peace with israel, it's the hate mongering and war mongering israeli regime that needs to be ousted
america was also founded on genocide, what do you want to do about it now?
america was also founded on genocide, what do you want to do about it now?
smash the white supremacist settler state??? duh???the average palestinian wants to live in peace with israel, it's the hate mongering and war mongering israeli regime that needs to be ousted
lol ok dude. we just have to get rid of the hateful and war mongering nazis, then the third reich will be fine
america was also founded on genocide, what do you want to do about it now?
Also you're not following the argument, which is that Israel is a genocidal state and is genocidal by its very nature, genocide is built into its DNA, and the genocide it was founded on continues to this day with the Palestinians. The example of the US only strengthens this argument - the US was founded on the genocide of Native Americans, and the genocide of Native Americans continued unabated until they were completely wiped out and brought to heel. You could even make an argument that this genocide continues in the neglect and oppression of Native communities, the US even takes Native children from their parents and places them in white foster care under (at best) questionable circumstances ([url]http://www.npr.org/2011/10/25/141672992/native-foster-care-lost-children-shattered-families[/url]), which is a hallmark of genocidal policy. This is the future of the Palestinians if Israel is allowed to continue to exist as a Jewish supremacist settler state.
yes.. the third reich ceased to exist after the nazis fell, it only refers to the period of nazi rule....
america was also founded on genocide, what do you want to do about it now?
Also you're not following the argument, which is that Israel is a genocidal state and is genocidal by its very nature, genocide is built into its DNA, and the genocide it was founded on continues to this day with the Palestinians. The example of the US only strengthens this argument - the US was founded on the genocide of Native Americans, and the genocide of Native Americans continued unabated until they were completely wiped out and brought to heel. You could even make an argument that this genocide continues in the neglect and oppression of Native communities, the US even takes Native children from their parents and places them in white foster care under (at best) questionable circumstances ([url]http://www.npr.org/2011/10/25/141672992/native-foster-care-lost-children-shattered-families[/url]), which is a hallmark of genocidal policy. This is the future of the Palestinians if Israel is allowed to continue to exist as a Jewish supremacist settler state.
i'm following the argument fine, you just don't have a very coherent one.
yes.. the third reich ceased to exist after the nazis fell, it only refers to the period of nazi rule....
1) That's the whole point, there weren't any good Nazis, genocide and hatred and war was intrinsic to their character, they had to be removed from power completely. So it is with Zionism.
2) Lol if you think the Third Reich just ceased to exist. The US and its network of postwar client states was the Reich's successor, a reactionary and militaristic global power with the number one domestic and foreign policy goal of protecting capital and smashing worker movements
didn't netanyahu nearly lose the recent election? he was crying hard saying "arabs are voting in droves". it's a joke that this retard racist is still in office.
the party in charge during cast lead was actually made up of former likud members.
netanyhau's main opposition was the zionist union, and the joint list. the zionist union says they want to actually hold dialogue with the palestians to solve issues while netanyhau's racist party ignores them. the joint list is actually made up of communists, socialists and feminists and led by an arab. that's probably why netanyau was crying so hard about arabs voting.
yea i'm not sure why you can't understand how removing a hostile moron like netanyahu could drastically improve the situation.
kadima was made up of ex likud members, why would they be better.
voting apathy is dangerous
what do you think zionist union is. the left is almost as dead in israel as it is in the us
no it isn't. the third biggest party in israel is joint list.
what do you think zionist union is. the left is almost as dead in israel as it is in the us
arabs are a minority in israel , they make up 20% of israel's population. for them to have any seats in the Knesset, enough to be the third largest party in the country is huge .no it isn't. the third biggest party in israel is joint list.
what do you think zionist union is. the left is almost as dead in israel as it is in the us
Joint List is a pan-Arab party that includes everyone from leftists to islamists to center-left collaborator types and their only purpose (and the only thing they can realistically accomplish politically) is to be a united voting bloc for Arab Israeli interests. They only have 13 seats in the Knesset out of 120. Further the interests of Israeli Arabs and Palestinians in the OT do not always align. But it doesn't matter anyway because such a party is never going to get a majority in the Knesset and is never going to win significant votes from Israeli Jews and Israel is still completely without a credible or effective left opposition. And history shows its probably a matter of time before the mainstream Jewish parties try to ban them just for being Arab anyway.
arabs are a minority in israel , they make up 20% of israel's population. for them to have any seats in the Knesset, enough to be the third largest party in the country is huge .
you're right that palestinians and israeli arabs won't always have the same opinions on every issue but that's every party. what matters are the core issues , the main one being peaceful resolution and better rights for the palestinians.
to claim it'll never get better as long as israel exists is quite dire, as israel will probably never go anywhere and it would require only extreme force from powerful military to oust them. a highly developed nation of over 8million people isn't just going to disappear. and how would you morally be able to do something like that without genocidal crimes against humanity ?? then the fact that israel has nukes, yea not a good situation for anyone.at this point we need a government in israel that's willing to work with palestinians to a peaceful resolution not some war mongering piece of shit like netanyahu.
did you guys know about bernie's position on gun control? i didn't..... [url]http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2015/05/bernie_sanders_on_guns_vermont_independent_voted_against_gun_control_for.html[/url] ([url]http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2015/05/bernie_sanders_on_guns_vermont_independent_voted_against_gun_control_for.html[/url])
his support for gun ownership is a little more than what you're describing - he even voted against the Brady bill, among other things (e.g., allowing people to carry guns on Amtrak trains - what could go wrong when you combine people and guns in an enclosed space that is travelling at 70 mph or whatever?). i also don't think the implication of the article is that one should prefer clinton over him. clinton is awful obviously, but i think this just goes to show that bernie isn't some savior of the left or anything (as you've been discussing with jon). my personal voting plan is to vote for bernie in the primaries as my way of telling the dems that i prefer a shift to the left for the party, and then abstaining from the actual election. i know it won't make a difference but w/edid you guys know about bernie's position on gun control? i didn't..... [url]http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2015/05/bernie_sanders_on_guns_vermont_independent_voted_against_gun_control_for.html[/url] ([url]http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2015/05/bernie_sanders_on_guns_vermont_independent_voted_against_gun_control_for.html[/url])
yeah as the article says its largely a political thing due to demographics and constituency. to be honest i am very cynical about sanders and don't plan on supporting him with any kind of enthusiasm but these kinds of attacks seem like they're coming straight from cynical centrist dems. like he votes to shield gun manufacturers once and i'm supposed to be more upset about that than clinton being a complete sycophant to every industry but the firearm industry? its a bad vote and a bad position from every angle (even if you "support the second amendment" there's no good reason to shield gun manufacturers from liability) but in the big picture its kinda meh and seems like the kind of thing a candidate like clinton would love to use to bash him with
my personal voting plan is to vote for bernie in the primaries as my way of telling the dems that i prefer a shift to the left for the party, and then abstaining from the actual election. i know it won't make a difference but w/eyeah i only ever want to vote for people that will lose. if theyre gonna win then id prefer to vote for someone else, further to the left, as a fuck you. trying to decide between doing that and not voting at all is spending way too much time on a question whose answer is pretty irrelevant
lol at point #1
What if the left opposes gun control?
“Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary.”
– Karl Marx, March, 1850
his support for gun ownership is a little more than what you're describing - he even voted against the Brady bill, among other things (e.g., allowing people to carry guns on Amtrak trains - what could go wrong when you combine people and guns in an enclosed space that is travelling at 70 mph or whatever?). i also don't think the implication of the article is that one should prefer clinton over him. clinton is awful obviously, but i think this just goes to show that bernie isn't some savior of the left or anything (as you've been discussing with jon). my personal voting plan is to vote for bernie in the primaries as my way of telling the dems that i prefer a shift to the left for the party, and then abstaining from the actual election. i know it won't make a difference but w/edid you guys know about bernie's position on gun control? i didn't..... [url]http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2015/05/bernie_sanders_on_guns_vermont_independent_voted_against_gun_control_for.html[/url] ([url]http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2015/05/bernie_sanders_on_guns_vermont_independent_voted_against_gun_control_for.html[/url])
yeah as the article says its largely a political thing due to demographics and constituency. to be honest i am very cynical about sanders and don't plan on supporting him with any kind of enthusiasm but these kinds of attacks seem like they're coming straight from cynical centrist dems. like he votes to shield gun manufacturers once and i'm supposed to be more upset about that than clinton being a complete sycophant to every industry but the firearm industry? its a bad vote and a bad position from every angle (even if you "support the second amendment" there's no good reason to shield gun manufacturers from liability) but in the big picture its kinda meh and seems like the kind of thing a candidate like clinton would love to use to bash him with
Republicans are a joke, the problem is they're a joke taken seriously by too many braindead americans, like people who are fooled by onion articles as legitimate.
Republicans are a joke, the problem is they're a joke taken seriously by too many braindead americans, like people who are fooled by onion articles as legitimate.
Fascinating stuff.
Republicans are a joke, the problem is they're a joke taken seriously by too many braindead americans, like people who are fooled by onion articles as legitimate.
Fascinating stuff.
American welfare is fascinating stuff.
Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk
Republicans are a joke, the problem is they're a joke taken seriously by too many braindead americans, like people who are fooled by onion articles as legitimate.
Fascinating stuff.
American welfare is fascinating stuff.
Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk
What's fascinating about it?
Republicans are a joke, the problem is they're a joke taken seriously by too many braindead americans, like people who are fooled by onion articles as legitimate.
Fascinating stuff.
American welfare is fascinating stuff.
Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk
What's fascinating about it?
The art of giving money away for free.
Very fascinating.
Since your accustomed to it, I'd like to take your account into the experience!
[emoji2]
Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk
Republicans are a joke, the problem is they're a joke taken seriously by too many braindead americans, like people who are fooled by onion articles as legitimate.
Fascinating stuff.
Republicans are a joke, the problem is they're a joke taken seriously by too many braindead americans, like people who are fooled by onion articles as legitimate.
Fascinating stuff.
American welfare is fascinating stuff.
Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk
What's fascinating about it?
The art of giving money away for free.
Very fascinating.
Since your accustomed to it, I'd like to take your account into the experience!
[emoji2]
Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk
I don't think any of that is very fascinating at all, but I suppose you're more easily fascinated than me I guess.
Republicans are a joke, the problem is they're a joke taken seriously by too many braindead americans, like people who are fooled by onion articles as legitimate.
Fascinating stuff.
American welfare is fascinating stuff.
Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk
What's fascinating about it?
The art of giving money away for free.
Very fascinating.
Since your accustomed to it, I'd like to take your account into the experience!
[emoji2]
Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk
Republicans are a joke, the problem is they're a joke taken seriously by too many braindead americans, like people who are fooled by onion articles as legitimate.
Fascinating stuff.
you're annoying, shut up.
Republicans are a joke, the problem is they're a joke taken seriously by too many braindead americans, like people who are fooled by onion articles as legitimate.
Fascinating stuff.
American welfare is fascinating stuff.
Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk
What's fascinating about it?
The art of giving money away for free.
Very fascinating.
Since your accustomed to it, I'd like to take your account into the experience!
[emoji2]
Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk
how is doing pointless jobs better? we literally create dumb jobs just so people have something to do. these same half wits then start looking down on welfare recipients. why am i talking to you, you're a retard , gulag for you.
Well that is not always a bad thing...keeping the human mind busy and active is shown to keep us living longer.
Sure I look down on people who take advantage of this broken system...but I don't blame them, naturally they are opportunists that take advantage of a exploitable system. I guess you could compare them to drug traffickers.
Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk
Republicans are a joke, the problem is they're a joke taken seriously by too many braindead americans, like people who are fooled by onion articles as legitimate.
Fascinating stuff.
you're annoying, shut up.
Sorry to interrupt your very intelligent and thought provoking posts about how Republicans are retarded so people should vote for Democrats instead.
Dude has a Stalin av and makes "lol epic gulag!!!" posts while at the same time shilling for Bernie fucking Sanders, give me a fucking break.lol fuck off gimp, your posts all sound like middle class rants of someone who wishes he was part of the bougeious class. gulag for you.
Well that is not always a bad thing...keeping the human mind busy and active is shown to keep us living longer.
Sure I look down on people who take advantage of this broken system...but I don't blame them, naturally they are opportunists that take advantage of a exploitable system. I guess you could compare them to drug traffickers.
Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk
Nothing you say makes any sense, and you are really fucking stupid.
never said democrats should be voted for, but republicans are cartoonishly ridiculous.
Dude has a Stalin av and makes "lol epic gulag!!!" posts while at the same time shilling for Bernie fucking Sanders, give me a fucking break.lol fuck off gimp, your posts all sound like middle class rants of someone who wishes he was part of the bougeious class. gulag for you.
Republicans are a joke, the problem is they're a joke taken seriously by too many braindead americans, like people who are fooled by onion articles as legitimate.
Fascinating stuff.
American welfare is fascinating stuff.
Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk
What's fascinating about it?
The art of giving money away for free.
Very fascinating.
Since your accustomed to it, I'd like to take your account into the experience!
[emoji2]
Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk
how is doing pointless jobs better? we literally create dumb jobs just so people have something to do. these same half wits then start looking down on welfare recipients. why am i talking to you, you're a retard , gulag for you.
Well that is not always a bad thing...keeping the human mind busy and active is shown to keep us living longer.
Sure I look down on people who take advantage of this broken system...but I don't blame them, naturally they are opportunists that take advantage of a exploitable system. I guess you could compare them to drug traffickers. And we all know the amount of good they contribute to society.
[emoji5]️
Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk
Dude has a Stalin av and makes "lol epic gulag!!!" posts while at the same time shilling for Bernie fucking Sanders, give me a fucking break.lol fuck off gimp, your posts all sound like middle class rants of someone who wishes he was part of the bougeious class. gulag for you.
Lol what the fuck are you even talking about you cargo cult retard, you don't know what any of those words mean.
Dude has a Stalin av and makes "lol epic gulag!!!" posts while at the same time shilling for Bernie fucking Sanders, give me a fucking break.lol fuck off gimp, your posts all sound like middle class rants of someone who wishes he was part of the bougeious class. gulag for you.
Lol what the fuck are you even talking about you cargo cult retard, you don't know what any of those words mean.
what words, bougeious? middle class, gulag? what the fuck are you talking about?
you're a bougeious admiring scum fuck who wishes to feast on truffle carpaccio and $1500 wine which is why your rants reek of jealously towards the bourgeoisie rather than pure unadulterated hatred like mine, you're meant for the gulag.
Dude has a Stalin av and makes "lol epic gulag!!!" posts while at the same time shilling for Bernie fucking Sanders, give me a fucking break.lol fuck off gimp, your posts all sound like middle class rants of someone who wishes he was part of the bougeious class. gulag for you.
Lol what the fuck are you even talking about you cargo cult retard, you don't know what any of those words mean.
what words, bougeious? middle class, gulag? what the fuck are you talking about?
you're a bougeious admiring scum fuck who wishes to feast on truffle carpaccio and $1500 wine which is why your rants reek of jealously towards the bourgeoisie rather than pure unadulterated hatred like mine, you're meant for the gulag.
Lol you are such a tryhard.
Dude has a Stalin av and makes "lol epic gulag!!!" posts while at the same time shilling for Bernie fucking Sanders, give me a fucking break.lol fuck off gimp, your posts all sound like middle class rants of someone who wishes he was part of the bougeious class. gulag for you.
Lol what the fuck are you even talking about you cargo cult retard, you don't know what any of those words mean.
what words, bougeious? middle class, gulag? what the fuck are you talking about?
you're a bougeious admiring scum fuck who wishes to feast on truffle carpaccio and $1500 wine which is why your rants reek of jealously towards the bourgeoisie rather than pure unadulterated hatred like mine, you're meant for the gulag.
how are you going to call someone retarded in the same sentence showing you're totally inept at basic grammar? ;D
how are you going to call someone retarded in the same sentence showing you're totally inept at basic grammar? ;D
how are you going to call someone retarded in the same sentence showing you're totally inept at basic grammar? ;D
Bashing someone for not having the social privilege of a quality education, more lessons in Marxism from Jon.
how are you going to call someone retarded in the same sentence showing you're totally inept at basic grammar? ;D
Bashing someone for not having the social privilege of a quality education, more lessons in Marxism from Jon.
the only privilege i have over him is not being born with a brain that stopped developing past 12 years.
how are you going to call someone retarded in the same sentence showing you're totally inept at basic grammar? ;D
Bashing someone for not having the social privilege of a quality education, more lessons in Marxism from Jon.
the only privilege i have over him is not being born with a brain that stopped developing past 12 years.
You don't know that. People learn grammar in schools, if he has bad grammar the most likely reason is that he went to a terrible American public school.
trump's a retarded piece of shit, he could destroy the amerikkkan empire over night. vote trump.
[/url]US Pres Candidate #JillStein goes on record live on @RT_America now calling #Netanyahu admin "war criminals." #Palestine #Israel #Jill2016
— Manila Chan 🧨 (@ManilaChan) June 23, 2015
Green party is dumb, if you want to support a fringe party with no chance of winning why pick a capitalist one?
;D ;D ;D ;D
yea those are nazi soldiers (waffen-ss) next to his soldier
lmfao
I'd take Trump over Hilary and Bush any day, but I would much rather have Rand Paul or jesse Ventura.
Chill pinky. Just because I have a different political preference than u doesn't make me insane.I'd take Trump over Hilary and Bush any day, but I would much rather have Rand Paul or jesse Ventura.
Thanks for your input, local insane retard.
It actually does, right wing politics is a mental illness that can only be cured through reeducation in Marxist science.Because you say so right?
It actually does, right wing politics is a mental illness that can only be cured through reeducation in Marxist science.Because you say so right?
Sent from my SGH-I317M using Tapatalk
republican debate is going to be so good
everytime i see a clip with Jindal he's always talking about socialism like he's talking about nazism. he called hillary a socialist too.
[url]http://youtu.be/OKkJ-K8qPXo[/url] ([url]http://youtu.be/OKkJ-K8qPXo[/url])
[emoji38] Obama hugger!
Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk
Can we briefly discuss whether I know anyone in this thread?
Can we briefly discuss whether I know anyone in this thread?
No. Die bitch.
lol is that really bizatch
My official #MakeAmericaGreatAgain hat is now available online. To shop please visit http://t.co/3zYiIYWs87 --- it is selling fast!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 11, 2015
[url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qukPLN1kFws[/url] ([url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qukPLN1kFws[/url])
Rubio hits kid in the face with football
[url]http://www.cnn.com/2015/08/18/politics/marco-rubio-hits-kid-football/index.html[/url] ([url]http://www.cnn.com/2015/08/18/politics/marco-rubio-hits-kid-football/index.html[/url])
Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk
Donald Trump is defending his controversial immigration plan, telling Fox News’ Bill O'Reilly that the 14th Amendment — which guarantees citizenship to all people “born or naturalized in the United States,” including children whose parents came to the country illegally — is unconstitutional.
“It’s not going to hold up in court,” Trump said on The Factor Tuesday.
the native american being labeled "uncivilized" is highly ironic coming from the early white setters and their early presidential masters. the crimes they committed remain the most savage against humanity, still centuries after. today we'd be far better off under the socialist system the natives had then this retard capitalistic garbage we're totally forced subservient to - which really benefits only the rich.
The Sanders campaign has faced legitimate criticism for its rhetoric centering around economic justice on the grounds that it is an inadequate pathway for addressing specific racial justice concerns.Lol just lol
[url]http://gawker.com/are-bernie-sanders-supporters-his-biggest-problem-1725094004[/url] ([url]http://gawker.com/are-bernie-sanders-supporters-his-biggest-problem-1725094004[/url]) the way the clinton machine is mobilizing idiot kids over shallow liberal identity politics to torpedo sanders is insane
this has nothing to do with clinton
anyways these morons are all over reddit, bernie supporters who refuse to believe black people have legitimate grievances, also think because bernie marched with mlk a billion years ago that black rights activists shouldn't try to confront bernie on how he will deal with police violence and black right issues.
"She did acknowledge that there are policies that she has been a part of promoting that have not worked," [Founder of BLM Boston] Yancey added, but said that Clinton's response was a "political" one.
"I am sure she understands. She is a brilliant woman," she said. "I think she gave the answer she wanted to give."
[url]http://gawker.com/are-bernie-sanders-supporters-his-biggest-problem-1725094004[/url] ([url]http://gawker.com/are-bernie-sanders-supporters-his-biggest-problem-1725094004[/url]) the way the clinton machine is mobilizing idiot kids over shallow liberal identity politics to torpedo sanders is insane
this has nothing to do with clinton
anyways these morons are all over reddit, bernie supporters who refuse to believe black people have legitimate grievances, also think because bernie marched with mlk a billion years ago that black rights activists shouldn't try to confront bernie on how he will deal with police violence and black right issues.
[url]http://gawker.com/are-bernie-sanders-supporters-his-biggest-problem-1725094004[/url] ([url]http://gawker.com/are-bernie-sanders-supporters-his-biggest-problem-1725094004[/url]) the way the clinton machine is mobilizing idiot kids over shallow liberal identity politics to torpedo sanders is insane
this has nothing to do with clinton
anyways these morons are all over reddit, bernie supporters who refuse to believe black people have legitimate grievances, also think because bernie marched with mlk a billion years ago that black rights activists shouldn't try to confront bernie on how he will deal with police violence and black right issues.
Brainwashed by the liberal identity politic tidal wave.
my guess is that there are approximately............ ZERO bernie supporters who think black people dont have legitimate grievances. like lol you support the self-identified socialist but DONT believe black people have legitimate grievances? no way. does not exist.
You think its just a coincidence when they finally got around to "disrupting" Clinton they announced the specific time and place? And then got a private meeting with her and released a recorded staged video of after? Or that they say things like this:
"She did acknowledge that there are policies that she has been a part of promoting that have not worked," [Founder of BLM Boston] Yancey added, but said that Clinton's response was a "political" one.
"I am sure she understands. She is a brilliant woman," she said. "I think she gave the answer she wanted to give."
And the Clinton thing is not just some of these people in leadership positions in BLM being in her pocket, its media outlets like Gawker using this as an excuse to skewer Sanders over bullshit.
You think its just a coincidence when they finally got around to "disrupting" Clinton they announced the specific time and place? And then got a private meeting with her and released a recorded staged video of after? Or that they say things like this:
"She did acknowledge that there are policies that she has been a part of promoting that have not worked," [Founder of BLM Boston] Yancey added, but said that Clinton's response was a "political" one.
"I am sure she understands. She is a brilliant woman," she said. "I think she gave the answer she wanted to give."
And the Clinton thing is not just some of these people in leadership positions in BLM being in her pocket, its media outlets like Gawker using this as an excuse to skewer Sanders over bullshit.
the article is about how sanders supporters are attacking the black lives matter movement, which they are doing. and you think clinton is involved in this somehow. lol.
my guess is that there are approximately............ ZERO bernie supporters who think black people dont have legitimate grievances. like lol you support the self-identified socialist but DONT believe black people have legitimate grievances? no way. does not exist.
it's just become: people wondering why the h*ck the black lives matter people [note: apparently that's like a formal organization and not a slogan now, i did not know that] chose to ruin a bernie rally with 30k people waiting to listen to bernie must all be white men progressives who are racist
You think its just a coincidence when they finally got around to "disrupting" Clinton they announced the specific time and place? And then got a private meeting with her and released a recorded staged video of after? Or that they say things like this:
"She did acknowledge that there are policies that she has been a part of promoting that have not worked," [Founder of BLM Boston] Yancey added, but said that Clinton's response was a "political" one.
"I am sure she understands. She is a brilliant woman," she said. "I think she gave the answer she wanted to give."
And the Clinton thing is not just some of these people in leadership positions in BLM being in her pocket, its media outlets like Gawker using this as an excuse to skewer Sanders over bullshit.
the article is about how sanders supporters are attacking the black lives matter movement, which they are doing. and you think clinton is involved in this somehow. lol.
"Sanders supporters" are doing this? Which ones? You're using weasel words Jon.
Re: Clinton, again, do you think the disparity between the way these people have treated a candidate like Sanders, who has much more credibility on the issues they advocate for than the other candidates, and Clinton, is just a coincidence? Do you think the huge media conglomerates represented by sites like Gawker are interested in a good faith criticism of latent white supremacy on the left?
https://www.reddit.com/r/SandersForPresident/ (https://www.reddit.com/r/SandersForPresident/)
wait you think it's possible for BLM to do the same that they did to sanders, to clinton? like clinton doesn't have secret service protecting her..
https://www.reddit.com/r/SandersForPresident/ (https://www.reddit.com/r/SandersForPresident/)
Yeah you're being weaselly again. Even if every single person who posted or read this subreddit hated BLM and didn't support them (bullshit), some retards on Reddit don't constitute a general problem with "Sanders supporters."wait you think it's possible for BLM to do the same that they did to sanders, to clinton? like clinton doesn't have secret service protecting her..
Lmfao. These cool radicals willing to call out even a SOCIALIST running for President are too scared to try and protest a Clinton speech. Damn dude you are retarded.
https://www.reddit.com/r/SandersForPresident/ (https://www.reddit.com/r/SandersForPresident/)
Yeah you're being weaselly again. Even if every single person who posted or read this subreddit hated BLM and didn't support them (bullshit), some retards on Reddit don't constitute a general problem with "Sanders supporters."
the gawker article is probably a response to bernie supporters on social media, including reddit, which top rated posts are about how the BLM should shut up because Sanders marched with MLK and is a supposed ardent black rights activist. . , basically refusing that they had any legitimate to say. This isn't a Clinton conspiracy.wait you think it's possible for BLM to do the same that they did to sanders, to clinton? like clinton doesn't have secret service protecting her..
Lmfao. These cool radicals willing to call out even a SOCIALIST running for President are too scared to try and protest a Clinton speech. Damn dude you are retarded.
BLM did try to protest a clinton speech, they were barred from where she was speaking. clinton has actual security , you can't walk up to her like you could with sanders.
not sure how to make this any clearer. stop playing video games, it's hurting your brain i think.
Yeah so then let's agree to a staged conversation with her instead. lol. You have no clue about how these things work and how easily movements are coopted and become establishment stooges.
They probably are but I'm still way smarter than you rofl.
i never watched this "staged conversation" you're talking about so i can't comment on it.
Jon is going to end up supporting Hillary Clinton because he thinks Bernie Sanders doesn't care about black people enough.
I clicked this link and don't see anything about Black Lives Matter on the front page so I still don't know what you mean. One thing that's cool is interrupting a candidate's event and forcing it to shut down, because then if people complain about it, it means the candidate has a problem with racist supporters.You think its just a coincidence when they finally got around to "disrupting" Clinton they announced the specific time and place? And then got a private meeting with her and released a recorded staged video of after? Or that they say things like this:
"She did acknowledge that there are policies that she has been a part of promoting that have not worked," [Founder of BLM Boston] Yancey added, but said that Clinton's response was a "political" one.
"I am sure she understands. She is a brilliant woman," she said. "I think she gave the answer she wanted to give."
And the Clinton thing is not just some of these people in leadership positions in BLM being in her pocket, its media outlets like Gawker using this as an excuse to skewer Sanders over bullshit.
the article is about how sanders supporters are attacking the black lives matter movement, which they are doing. and you think clinton is involved in this somehow. lol.
"Sanders supporters" are doing this? Which ones? You're using weasel words Jon.
https://www.reddit.com/r/SandersForPresident/ (https://www.reddit.com/r/SandersForPresident/)
#FucktardFollowTrain follow+retweet if you are a #fucktard
— Cam Fantastic (@CamFantastic1) August 20, 2015
https://www.reddit.com/r/SandersForPresident/ (https://www.reddit.com/r/SandersForPresident/)
I clicked this link and don't see anything about Black Lives Matter on the front page so I still don't know what you mean.
I don't really know if I believe the Clinton angle because I think all these articles and posts like Jon's are the natural sort of jostling to proudly get on the right side of the latest identity politics issue.
you're just not aware of what is going on. the article is in response to a large movement of bernie supporters trivializing the blm movement.
Where is this "large movement?" You know "movement" implies some sort of organization, right?
As far as I can tell this is just random internet retards.yea you keep saying this like people on the internet aren't actually real people. like they aren't the same as the people who yelled at the blm movement people to get off the stage and let bernie speak when he was interrupted.
How are they trivializing Black Lives Matter? You link to that megathread and it mostly just seems to be full of people talking about what happened, after it happened. It's dropped off the front page now. Where is this "large movement" that I'm not aware of?
https://www.reddit.com/r/SandersForPresident/ (https://www.reddit.com/r/SandersForPresident/)
I clicked this link and don't see anything about Black Lives Matter on the front page so I still don't know what you mean.
because the threads aren't on the front page anymore.
https://www.reddit.com/r/SandersForPresident/comments/3gadni/seattle_afternoon_rally_blacklivesmatter/ (https://www.reddit.com/r/SandersForPresident/comments/3gadni/seattle_afternoon_rally_blacklivesmatter/)I don't really know if I believe the Clinton angle because I think all these articles and posts like Jon's are the natural sort of jostling to proudly get on the right side of the latest identity politics issue.
you're just not aware of what is going on. the article is in response to a large movement of bernie supporters trivializing the blm movement.
no not necessarily.
yea you keep saying this like people on the internet aren't actually real people. like they aren't the same as the people who yelled at the blm movement people to get off the stage and let bernie speak when he was interrupted.
Jon is GenderHoxha.
Invalid Tweet ID
its bernie supporters in general who lashed out against BLM after they interrupted his speech, they trivialized the movement, that's what the gawkers article is about. this isn't the argument - this is a fact.
The people took the mic and Bernie ended up having to leave the stage without speaking. Who cares if some people booed or got upset or questioned why they were targeting Bernie's rally? It's a natural reaction. To go from there (some people were upset) to the weird liberal identity politics self-policing wtih headlines like "It's time to talk about the large anti-BLM movement from Bernie supporters" is pretty typical in the "everything is problematic" way people behave nowadays but it's stupid.You don't even know what you're talking about, the gawkers article wasn't written because of a couple boos against BLM. It was more then just that, it was the popular reaction among bernie supporters all over social media , including sites like reddit, that flat out ignored that BLM had legitimate grievances. not that there aren't some bernie supporters who are understanding, there definitely are. but the article wasn't just written to create a made-up issue or to complain about a minor one.
You don't even know what you're talking about, the gawkers article wasn't written because of a couple boos against BLM. It was more then just that, it was the popular reaction among bernie supporters all over social media , including sites like reddit, that flat out ignored that BLM had legitimate grievances. not that there aren't some bernie supporters who are understanding, there definitely are.
but the article wasn't just written to create a made-up issue or to complain about a minor one.
You don't even know what you're talking about, the gawkers article wasn't written because of a couple boos against BLM. It was more then just that, it was the popular reaction among bernie supporters all over social media , including sites like reddit, that flat out ignored that BLM had legitimate grievances. not that there aren't some bernie supporters who are understanding, there definitely are.
Can you cite some specific examples of this?but the article wasn't just written to create a made-up issue or to complain about a minor one.
Gawker Media: Where you can find serious, good faith discussion about the serious issues for adults.
Nobody is saying black people don't have legitimate grievances. Thats a strawman. Even if an angry person on reddit said "fuck these people for doing this! fuck BLM!" you can't presume that they don't believe there are issues affecting black people in America. All you can take from it is that they're upset that the candidate they support had his event hijacked and they're mad at the protesters who did it.The people took the mic and Bernie ended up having to leave the stage without speaking. Who cares if some people booed or got upset or questioned why they were targeting Bernie's rally? It's a natural reaction. To go from there (some people were upset) to the weird liberal identity politics self-policing wtih headlines like "It's time to talk about the large anti-BLM movement from Bernie supporters" is pretty typical in the "everything is problematic" way people behave nowadays but it's stupid.You don't even know what you're talking about, the gawkers article wasn't written because of a couple boos against BLM. It was more then just that, it was the popular reaction among bernie supporters all over social media , including sites like reddit, that flat out ignored that BLM had legitimate grievances. not that there aren't some bernie supporters who are understanding, there definitely are. but the article wasn't just written to create a made-up issue or to complain about a minor one.
i don't know anything about gawker, but i did know about this issue among the bernie zombies well before i read the article so i see it as legitimate criticism.
you want specific quotes from bernie zombies ? you can find those on your own if you cared enough. there are plenty who dismissed the blm protesters as rude and racist lol. shit some even threatened violence against them.
blid is flat out rejecting any bernie supporters trivialized the blm movement because there's nothing on the front page of reddit.
although i did link a thread which showed people doing exactly that, which is thinks was just people talking about the incident. lol.
blid is flat out rejecting any bernie supporters trivialized the blm movement because there's nothing on the front page of reddit.
I'm pretty sure both of us have acknowledged that Sanders supporters have said such things on the internet, we only question to what degree a few internet comments are indicative of a "movement" as you describe. So this is a lie.although i did link a thread which showed people doing exactly that, which is thinks was just people talking about the incident. lol.
So again just random internet commenters.
What do you think the problems with the Sanders campaign with regards to racial justice issues are, Jon?
again saying it's just people on the "internet" , these are real life people who will vote for bernie, many probably went to his rallies. not just random text on a computer screen.
the fact an article was written about it probably shows that's a bigger than than a small fraction of supporters.
also this is the attitude of most white people in general.
you've changed it from sanders supporters denying that black people have legitimate grievances and trivializing their problems... to sanders supporters trivializing the BLM movement. that's a big difference.
Im still not sure about "trivialized" but yes people were mad at the blm protesters who broke up the event and i think that's ok. you may support the people who interrupted his event and that's fine but i think it's ok to question these peoples tactics when their tactic was to shut down the guy whos basically their best possible ally in either primary.
however to so many people any criticism equals racism, because with this new brand of liberal, identity trumps all. in any debate about anything just find the most oppressed group and they're the ones who are right lol.what's this bullshit? sorry maybe i should think of the feelings of the oppressors first.
A Gawker article about a subject exists, therefore its a serious problem we should pay attention to. Sounds legit.
it's more than just the gawker article, it's social media in general. from highly upvoted shitposts on reddit, highly liked tweets, etc. it's not difficult to find the average opinion of the bernie supporter.
dude bernie doesn't get a free pass because he walked with mlk a hundred years ago.
the fact is black people are being slaughtered and imprisoned an inordinate amount over whites, and so considering this i can't criticize nor accept it as legitimate criticism that they were being too loud or a bit aggressive. that is totally understandable to me.
lol it's not that he walked with mlk fifty years ago, it's that he's supported civil rights his entire career, already backs all the stuff the blm people are arguing for, and on top of that his economic platform is the best thing short of revolution that's up for offer. you can say "well their fight is important, and doing this got them a lot of attention." fine. i dont care if someone believes that, and i can see that viewpoint. but some people will certainly be upset that bernie's event got shut down! they will say what i said in the first sentence and then be like "wtf is wrong with these protesters?" somehow that compeltely understandable reaction becomes, remember what started all this discussion in this thread, "Bernie's Problem With Race."
A free pass from...what exactly? What are people giving him a pass on? All those build more prisons and throw more black people in them bills he sponsored?
Goddamn dude you're allowed to disagree with a black person. If they were saying vote for Jeb Bush to end white supremacy in the United States are you not going to criticize that? Nor accept as legitimate criticism anyone who does? Christ.
i'm talking directly to blid you utter moron, who thinks because of some of his earlier activism, blacks should give him a pass. start reading or stop posting in here.
however i'm saying i don't think it's legitimate criticism to say they were rude or loud, considering what they're emotionally charged about is completely understandable, not that legitimate criticism of BLM doesn't exist at all.
shit , you're the same dude who called anyone who didn't think kanye west was the best artist of all time racists.
giving him a pass on criticism from the BLM movement because of his earlier activism.
On the one-year anniversary of the police murder of Kajieme Powell in St. Louis, Missouri, officers once again shot and killed an African-American youth, identified as Mansur Ball-Bey, 18. The murder took place roughly five miles from where Powell was shot to death
can't understand why BLM are so animated, they should stfu.
([url]http://i.imgur.com/xaewZXT.jpg[/url])
lol youre the one who was Feelin the bern on page one of this thread, where I also linked to an article that covered all that stuff. just because I'm not falling for the identity politics bullshit about Bernie's Problem on Race or whatever doesnt mean im the avid bernie supporter you were before you discovered /r/socialism
(https://i.imgur.com/uHPo21B.jpg)
you were masturbating to a 8 hour bernie sanders filibuster.
(https://i.imgur.com/OjQUuXs.png)
(https://i.imgur.com/GbTJlkW.png)
(https://i.imgur.com/QBvEBx4.png)
(https://i.imgur.com/uECBKsO.png)
(https://i.imgur.com/fYFt9SS.png)
(https://i.imgur.com/jywOcRv.png)
you were masturbating to a 8 hour bernie sanders filibuster.
If Jon still believes in voting and thinks rejecting the system and not voting is apathy and laziness, then he should still support Bernie Sanders shouldn't he?
You shouldn't even be allowed to make this thread unless you vote, and vote for Sanders.
gtfo out this thread shit spewing clown, you've barely got any reading comprehension past 5th grade and think May was a few weeks ago. regardless i already addressed this but you don't read anything, you want to shitpost all over threads like the useless troll you've always been.
You shouldn't even be allowed to make this thread unless you vote, and vote for Sanders.
If Jon still believes in voting and thinks rejecting the system and not voting is apathy and laziness, then he should still support Bernie Sanders shouldn't he?
i'd still probably vote for bernie if i was american, reason being he's the best candidate. maybe that is buying into the system and lapping up his bullshit, but um you aren't "rejecting the system" by doing nothing either, lol.
i actually don't vote, i just don't want to delude myself into pretending i'm rejecting the system and making a change by choosing not to vote while playing video games all day and limiting my opinions to obscure internet forums. lolol.
he's too far left despite being an imperialist and a girly-armed dem soc.
MODERATOR: Now, on evolution—
— leon (@leyawn) August 7, 2015
CRUZ: Dinotopia is real
BUSH: I agree with the senator
WALKER: I've seen it
TRUMP: You can ride the dinosaurs
Congrats @LindseyGrahamSC. You just got 4 points in your home state of SC—far better than zero nationally. You’re only 26 pts behind me.
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 25, 2015
([url]http://i.imgur.com/QWWnCa2.jpg?1[/url])
Trump honestly could win which is hilarious. Lol at Ben Carson polling above Jeb Bush. Hm, usually Scott Walker is polling higher.
Trump honestly could win which is hilarious. Lol at Ben Carson polling above Jeb Bush. Hm, usually Scott Walker is polling higher.
Also pretty premature to say Trump can win imo, I guess its possible, but people forget Herman Cain had a commanding lead in the GOP primary in 2012 at one point.
(https://i.imgur.com/Go9uJHl.jpg)
Public Policy Polling: Donald Trump Leads GOP Vote; Most Supporters Believe Obama is Muslim, Poll Finds
The poll found that the Republican presidential candidate leads with 29 percent of the vote in the GOP field and that 66 percent of his supporters believe that President Barack Obama is Muslim.
([url]http://www.drweevil.org/s050_080.gif[/url])
Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk
Trump: Carson was 'heavy into the world of abortion'
Washington (CNN)Donald Trump slammed Ben Carson Thursday morning, one day after the retired neurosurgeon questioned the businessman's faith.
Trump told CNN's Chris Cuomo on "New Day" that Carson, who was the first surgeon to separate conjoined twins joined at the head, was just an "OK doctor" and said "you look at his faith and I think you're not going to find so much."
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CO9XrslXAAAcH1w.png)
the "dead communist dictator" he is referring to is hugo chavez.
voting apathy is dangerous
Voting is dangerous because its an implicit acceptance and approval of the system.
voting apathy is dangerous
Voting is dangerous because its an implicit acceptance and approval of the system.
What about if you vote for someone who you believe is not part of the "system" and wants to change the system
then what
([url]http://i.imgur.com/32gzNkr.gif[/url])
Joseph Tyree Sneed III
Driving through SC last night & we refused to take this left. We took a right and headed toward "Prosperity." pic.twitter.com/vuZmZl3e1W
— Gov. Mike Huckabee (@GovMikeHuckabee) September 23, 2015
Speaker Boehner's resignation shocks Congress - CNN
https://apple.news/AY4ad01DTSjynoRcehJ-amA
Ineffective server Admins should maybe also follow suit.
Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk
Speaker Boehner's resignation shocks Congress - CNN
https://apple.news/AY4ad01DTSjynoRcehJ-amA
Ineffective server Admins should maybe also follow suit.
Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk
You should follow suit and resign from this mortal coil.
you know people with that sticker watch fox news
Why is Bernie Sanders NOT a socialist?short answer: he's a capitalist
Why is Bernie Sanders NOT a socialist?short answer: he's a capitalist
his ideas consist of working within the framework of capitalism.
Why is Bernie Sanders NOT a socialist?short answer: he's a capitalist
his ideas consist of working within the framework of capitalism.
Why is Bernie Sanders NOT a socialist?short answer: he's a capitalist
his ideas consist of working within the framework of capitalism.
Would you say this is the strongest distinction between a democrat and a socialist
Alex Jones Endorses Rand Paul: ‘America Needs Real Change’
Ben Carson on CNN: If Germans had guns, Hitler's chances of successful genocide "would have been greatly diminished."
— Daniel Dale (@ddale8) October 8, 2015
([url]http://z.cdn.turner.com/cnn/interactive/2015/09/politics/2016-republican-debate/media/R_TRUMP_01.gif[/url])
Rand Paul links Bernie Sanders to Mao and Stalin, implying that a Sander's Presidency will lead to the death of millions of people.
(https://i.imgur.com/kwUIpTJ.jpg)The editors are right. The polls are just being flooded by rabid Bernieatars.
(https://i.imgur.com/kwUIpTJ.jpg)The editors are right. The polls are just being flooded by rabid Bernieatars.
Sanders is one of those "crony capitalism" not "real capitalism" dummies. Capitalism has never existed without government in its history, going back to when Columbus in partnership with the Spanish government went on an expedition ship to find riches and ultimately extracted resources in the Americas to bring back to Spain. Also brought back the natives for slaves. That's real capitalism for you - the only capitalism.
To me the most infuriating thing about libertarians of all is their completely fucktarded political economy wherein the state and "the market" (stand in for capitalist forces) are somehow at odds within a capitalist society.
I agree with their analysis, that Hillary's performance was strong and that by failing to be knocked down, she won the debate big time.
To me the most infuriating thing about libertarians of all is their completely fucktarded political economy wherein the state and "the market" (the capitalist private sector) are somehow at odds within a capitalist society.
How pathetic for @realdonaldtrump to criticize the president for 9/11. We were attacked & my brother kept us safe.
— Jeb Bush (@JebBush) October 16, 2015
No @JebBush, you’re pathetic for saying nothing happened during your brother’s term when the World Trade Center was attacked and came down.
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 17, 2015
Cruz should apply for work as a fox "news" anchor after he loses the republican nomination.
([url]http://i.imgur.com/F2eJY5n.jpg[/url])
Dear Canadians, If you are in doubt before the polls close please vote for Stephen Harper. He is the strongest on fighting radical Islam.
— Ayaan Hirsi Ali (@Ayaan) October 19, 2015
Hope Kith isn't taking these results too hard.
The BDS movement, like Israeli Apartheid Week, has no place on Canadian campuses. As a @McGillU alum, I’m disappointed. #EnoughIsEnough
— Justin Trudeau (@JustinTrudeau) March 13, 2015
The BDS movement, like Israeli Apartheid Week, has no place on Canadian campuses. As a @McGillU alum, I’m disappointed. #EnoughIsEnough
— Justin Trudeau (@JustinTrudeau) March 13, 2015
([url]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CSCwkK_WwAAcKLh.jpg:large[/url])
Ironically he's the one trying to change the definition. Marriage was never solely for a man and woman - same sex unions existed since ancient times.
...those type of comments are useless without backing them up with anything. i mean wtf.
...because it was historically between men and women doesn't mean that's what marriage's literal definition is. the fact is, it has only been dominantly between women and men because of discrimination against gays, not a definition. there is no universal accepted definition of marriage anyways as it can vary by cultures.
the fact is, it has only been dominantly between women and men because of discrimination against gays,
Your original statement was "marriage was never solely between a man and a woman, same sex unions existed since ancient times," which I called an over simplification and explained why it was an over simplification. Now you're saying something different and pretending it was what you were saying all along.
And this is really retarded and betrays a lack of understanding of the historical material basis of marriage, which is the patriarchal control of women's bodies and patriarchal control of reproduction and the social relationships and systems that spring from it (inheritance).
"Gays," which did not even exist in the sense you are talking about for most of history, are completely irrelevant to this.
Marriage was not always a male/female relationship - same-sex marriage did happen in ancient rome, they were in fact "codified".
It's true opposite-sex marriages was and may still be largely discriminatory against women, mostly in western culture.
Ironically you use the word irrelevant in the same sentence of a totally irrelevant comment. This was just a reply to you saying marriage was predominantly between men and women, and I was saying yea because of discriminatory laws against homosexuals - this includes, 18th, 19th, 20th and 21st centuries. The centuries where we're talking of the more modern understanding of homosexuality
On the AP U.S. History curriculum, Carson said it overemphasizes wrongdoing by the United States: "I think most people, when they finish that course, they’d be ready to go sign up for ISIS."[
It is important to remember that amateurs built the Ark and it was the professionals that built the Titanic. @my_ccu pic.twitter.com/6Nqod4sicS
— Ben & Candy Carson (@RealBenCarson) October 29, 2015
My first visit to Israel, in December 1981, sparked an enduring emotional connection for me — to the land and its people — and admiration for how Israelis have built a thriving democracy in a region full of adversaries and autocrats.
, including the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement. I’ve spoken out against BDS in the United States and at the U.N., and will continue to do so.
Hello, i have the brain of a retarded man instead of the normal mens brain, and im running for president.
Fox News suspends two commentators for profanity while criticizing Obama - CNN
[url]https://apple.news/ArhVLwin7SzS4EAsNflUoHQ[/url] ([url]https://apple.news/ArhVLwin7SzS4EAsNflUoHQ[/url])
Looks like @tedcruz is getting ready to attack. I am leading by so much he must. I hope so, he will fall like all others. Will be easy!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 11, 2015
Between Iraq war monger @krauthammer, dummy @KarlRove, deadpan @GeorgezWill, highly overrated @megynkelly, among others, @FoxNews not fair!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 15, 2015
Trump + Cruz = butt play
Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk
Trump + Cruz = butt play
Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk
Keep it to your journal sicko.
it's fumnny when republicans actually say correct things simply by trying to oppose democrats
“One of the problems with Marco's foreign policy is he is far too often supported Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama undermining governments in the Middle East that have helped radical Islamic terrorists,” Cruz continued.
Trump Was Right (about iraq)
Trump Was Right (about iraq)
Nah, he just did the opposite of what the majority did cuz he's trump.
Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk
Cruz is an unbelievably slimy weasel even by GOP Presidential candidate standards but he's probably the best debater on the stage.
Strength, power, and stamina.
Opposite Day is a myth. There's no such thing.Strength, power, and stamina.
Your qualities on Opposite Day.
Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk
Opposite Day is a myth. There's no such thing.Strength, power, and stamina.
Your qualities on Opposite Day.
Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk
oh we're taking the oil too, hadn't heard that one. i like how he says we're stopping muslims from coming in "until we can figure out what's going on"
1) It wouldn't be "early onset dementia" because Chomsky is at the age where dementia is not particularly unusual.
1) It wouldn't be "early onset dementia" because Chomsky is at the age where dementia is not particularly unusual.
this is incorrect, age is irrelevant. it wouldn't be early onset if he was already suffering from symptoms of dementia prior. not sure u why u thought to bring up an incorrect trivial point to this, but stfu dumbfuck.
no it's sad his support for Clinton is early symptoms of early-onset dementia. this is a guy who refers to himself as an anarcho-syndicalist , not only talking about voting but voting for some war mongering scum piece of garbage. this can only be a result of brain deterioration . RIP
you retarded kid shut the fuck up. supporting the first black family in the white house is not the same as voting for a fucking Clinton.
you retarded kid shut the fuck up. supporting the first black family in the white house is not the same as voting for a fucking Clinton.holy shit
supporting obama, who was potentially going to be the first black president, is vastly different from supporting another clinton. just reiterating myself due to the awkward reactions to the obvious.
it's a lot more shocking that Chomsky would support Clinton in 2016 than Obama in 2008.
I support the first ever black Nazi being elected Fuhrer, AND I support the first ever woman Nazi to be elected fuhrer. After that maybe a gay nazi and then a trans nazi and then maybe we can stop electing nazis
yea it is shocking. it's shocking Chomsky doesn't know Clinton isn't any less dangerous than any other republican.
yea it is shocking. it's shocking Chomsky doesn't know Clinton isn't any less dangerous than any other republican.
But you can't say the same thing about Obama? Rofl.
this is what happens when you take drugs and play video games all day
obama is black, first black man as president of amerikkka, you're a dumb bitch if you don't see this as anything other than historical,
so at least i can see why chomsky would support obama back during the elections ( i don't even know if he did, i haven't seen any articles written during that time endorsing him.. i have seen plenty of criticisms of obama in articles dated back to 2008 tho)..
Hilary is just a war mongering racist
and we've already had a clinton in office that espouses those same war mongering attitudes.
so yea i see chomsky's support for obama not even comparable to supporting clinton which is downright disturbing.
fact is though anyone referring to himself as an anarchist and participating at all in the electoral system is a ridiculous to begin with.
since he pushes the exact same neoliberal policy Clinton or another white President would push.
Finally, the other problem with this logic is it is mired in liberal identity politics - the idea that a black man being President is good in and of itself, regardless of policy. This is not the position of a serious Marxist.
since he pushes the exact same neoliberal policy Clinton or another white President would push.
Yea we know that now , and retrospectively it seems naive to think as a democrat he would do anything differently. but it was unprecedented at the time really, a lot of people were saying he'd have no chance to win simply because of his skin colour. so i'm not totally surprised by chomsky saying he would vote for obama in 2008, than i would be for his vote for another clinton in 2016.
QuoteFinally, the other problem with this logic is it is mired in liberal identity politics - the idea that a black man being President is good in and of itself, regardless of policy. This is not the position of a serious Marxist.
well chomsky isn't a marxist.
I don't agree with Chomsky's conclusion that one should vote for the Democrat as the lesser evil, but his argument makes logical sense even for an anarchist.
QuoteFinally, the other problem with this logic is it is mired in liberal identity politics - the idea that a black man being President is good in and of itself, regardless of policy. This is not the position of a serious Marxist.
well chomsky isn't a marxist.
You made that argument not Chomsky lol. Chomsky never said "vote for Obama because he is a black man and that is good."
QuoteI don't agree with Chomsky's conclusion that one should vote for the Democrat as the lesser evil, but his argument makes logical sense even for an anarchist.
voting for the "lesser evil" makes sense for an anarchist? lol
QuoteFinally, the other problem with this logic is it is mired in liberal identity politics - the idea that a black man being President is good in and of itself, regardless of policy. This is not the position of a serious Marxist.
well chomsky isn't a marxist.
You made that argument not Chomsky lol. Chomsky never said "vote for Obama because he is a black man and that is good."
he did write about the historical precedent of a black family being in the white house. i'd imagine this influenced his support partly.
Ted Cruz didn't win Iowa, he stole it. That is why all of the polls were so wrong and why he got far more votes than anticipated. Bad!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 3, 2016
Many people voted for Cruz over Carson because of this Cruz fraud. Also, Cruz sent out a VOTER VIOLATION certificate to thousands of voters.
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 3, 2016
The Voter Violation certificate gave poor marks to the unsuspecting voter(grade of F) and told them to clear it up by voting for Cruz. Fraud
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 3, 2016
Many people voted for Cruz over Carson because of this Cruz fraud. Also, Cruz sent out a VOTER VIOLATION certificate to thousands of voters.
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 3, 2016The Voter Violation certificate gave poor marks to the unsuspecting voter(grade of F) and told them to clear it up by voting for Cruz. Fraud
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 3, 2016
([url]http://media.fyre.co/Kgz8W9U6Q1CbXE4B9nVN_Bernie%20vs%20Hillary%20appealing%20to%20younger%20voters%20%282%29.jpg[/url])
Most (not all) blacks have been brainwashed so thoroughly that they are incapable of thinking for themselves. That may not be PC, however, I see no other answer.
Democratic party debate features fruitless bickering between two wretched fossils over which opiates struggling U.S. masses shall consume.
— DPRK News Service (@DPRK_News) February 5, 2016
Yammering gorgon Hillary Clinton urged to cease belligerent anti-DPRK rhetoric lest she become a worldwide joke.
— DPRK News Service (@DPRK_News) February 5, 2016
What's worse than waterboarding? "You'll find out," Trump tells me. pic.twitter.com/jbnx9czZHi
— Chris Megerian (@ChrisMegerian) February 7, 2016
Polling has Clinton, Sanders in virtual tie @KWelkerNBC @Fran_Chambers @NickConfessore https://t.co/r1v3PpbXoG pic.twitter.com/8qYyFGKScy
— The ReidOut (@thereidout) February 8, 2016
BERNIE: In America should people be financially distressed for decades for the crime, the crime of trying to get high, that’s absurd. Well, my critics say, you know, Bernie, that’s a great idea, you’re into all this free weed. How are you going to pay for it? I will tell you how we’re going to pay for it. We’re going to impose a tax on Wall Street speculation.
HILLARY: Let's get real here. [crowd boos] No, let's get real. Bernie's promises of free weed, it sounds great, it sounds great. Realistically, though, it means headies for none and schwag for all. [booing intensifies] No, no, but it's true. It's the only way to get it done and I'm not sure if young voters realize this.
America is a picture of Jeb Bush's name on a gun, according to Jeb Bush https://t.co/F5qVV1u2ro pic.twitter.com/lfVjBNnJTt
— CBC News (@CBCNews) February 17, 2016
Since Sanders is going to lose, its time to face the facts: True leftists should support Donald Trump for President.
Since Sanders is going to lose, its time to face the facts: True leftists should support Donald Trump for President.
there are berniebots who literally say they will vote trump if sanders loses
([url]http://i.imgur.com/9FfYX9O.gif[/url])
https://theintercept.com/2016/03/10/hillary-clinton-stalwart-friend-of-worlds-worst-despots-attacks-sanders-latin-american-activism/
dayum
honestly bernie is pussy/fucktarded for not hitting her harder on that shit when she brings up foreign policy
hmm heres a bernie speech p robably being attacked
BERNARD:
There are times that one wishes one was smarter than one is so that when one looks out at the world and sees the problems one wishes one knew the answers and I don't know the answers. I think sometimes one wishes one was dumber than one is so one doesn't have to look out into the world and see the pain that's out there and the horrible situations that are out there, and not know what to do.
I think what I would want to start off with tonight by saying is that really what is going on in terms of the United States' relationship to Nicaragua of course has nothing to do with Nicaragua. The nature of the conflict that now exists is based on the fact that for the last 150 years or so the United States government in its wisdom has decided that Latin America should be a colony of the United States government and that countries which attempt to stand up and do things for their own people rather than for American corporations are not to be tolerated.
What's going on in Nicaragua, it's not important to get into all the details of whether the Sandinistas are right or wrong on this issue. If we understand that in the last 30 years the United States has overthrown governments in Guatemala, Dominican Republic, they murdered Salvador Allende in Chile. They've overthrown the government of Grenada. They attempted to overthrow the government of Cuba. They overthrew a government in Brazil. And now they're attempting to overthrow the government of Nicaragua.
I think, all of you know that I am no great supporter of the President of the United States, I think one thing that we can say for him is that he's an honest and straightforward man. What he has said to Daniel Ortega and the people of Nicaragua- he's not gotten involved in these wishy washy terms of liberalism or international law, he's been quite upfront about it- and he said before the people of the world that "If you wish to survive as a nation, you can. All that you have to do is get down on your hands and knees and say uncle. That's all."
That's an interesting principle of international relations.
What he has said is that we in the United States are strong and powerful and we can destroy you anytime we want, and all you have to do is get down on your hands and knees or we will send in Rambo and Sylvester Stallone.
The basic crime being committed by the people of Nicaragua today is that the government there has the strange and unusual idea that they should attempt to do something for the people of Nicaragua rather than for the United States' corporations. It's a very strange idea for the independent nation to have. And if the history of the United States' relationship to Latin America for the last 50 years, which is:
Somoza- Yes. Ortega - No.
Batista - Yes. Castro - No.
Pinochet - mass murderer, torturer destroyer of democracy - Yes.
Loans, military money - Yes.
Salvador Allende, democratically elected by the people of Chile, his political party gaining in strength - No. Overthrown by the CIA and murdered. And 30,000 40,000 Chileans killed. Yes Pinochet.
When I was a kid going to school and I'm sure all of you had the same experience, we learned something about American History. And I think many of us are very proud to be Americans- many fantastic things, there's a boldness in this country, there's an energy in this country that doesn't exist elsewhere in the world. But what we didn't learn I think and what we are not proud of and I think what we do not intend to accept is that a relationship can be based on brute bully strength and we are not prepared to accept this nation dominating poor nations and weak nations which are trying to do decent things for their people.
I think if the Sister City relationship means anything, and it means a great deal to me and I know it means a great deal to you, it means that we believe that human beings on a face-to-face level are able to communicate with each other, are able to work out problems based on mutual respect, and that as Americans what we want of our nation, we want our nation to be brave and bold but not with guns and not with machine guns and not with napalm.
I personally, really, am not all that impressed by President Reagan's tough warlike rhetoric. If he wants to do something that's really gutsy and that's really brave, for a guy who does so well on the television, a master of the media- what I would do is challenge him to sit down before the television cameras of the entire world and sit down and talk to Ortega and the other people in Nicaragua and work out the problems based on mutual respect. Does he have the guts to do that? And I'm not sure that he does. I'm not sure that he has the answers to the sharp questions and the challenges the people throughout the Third World would be throwing at him.
You know, we live in a world today, and it really is depressing to think about it, we live in a world today where there are several hundred million people starving to death, they're starving to death right now. We live in a world where my guess is that between all the superpowers and the other nations of the world, close to one trillion dollars are being spent every single year on weapons, on more and more nuclear bombs, on the most sophisticated nerve gases which can wipe people out and paralyze them. And yet with all the brilliance and all the fine technology and all the robots and the great medical research that they do up there in the hospitals, civilization hasn't advanced one bloody iota for the last thousands of years. All that these people can do is still say to each "we're strong, you're weak, you do it our way or we're going to kill you". A very profound, civilized remark.
I think what we're here for today is to show President Reagan and many people who don't have the courage that we have, because what goes on in this country primarily through the television and through the media is that over and over again all that the President of the United States has to say is that Nicaragua is communist, Nicaragua is Marxist-Leninist, and now the new thing is Nicaragua is terrorist. And if you say it over a hundred times it now becomes truthful and then suddenly you see the professional politicians getting less and less bold in saying that maybe the President is wrong. Because you know appealing to people's hatred and their anger and their desire for revenge is very good politics. The truth of the matter is it has always worked and it's probably working today.
And you're going to find many college teachers a little bit less likely to speak out against it. Social workers a little bit less likely to speak out against the imperialism that now goes on. And I think what our task is, here in Burlington Vermont, and in the other communities that have sister-city relations, is to say that we're not afraid of that and that we reject that mentality... that what the real challenge of civilization today is and the challenge of the United States, and it's an enormous challenge and it's a difficult challenge and no one has any easy answers. But the real challenge is, in a world that is economically disintegrating , the conditions in the Third World today are as bad as they have ever ever been, and the challenges, the challenge for tough people (since) Mr Reagan thinks he's tough... the challenge for a tough person and for a tough society is how do we use our resources, our incredible wealth, our energy - not in military adventurism, but in working with people throughout the entire Third World, working with the people in Nicaragua in cooperation and in mutual respect, working with them so that children don't have to starve to death, don't have to die of diseases which these people up there on the hill, in our hospital, know the answers to... where people can learn to read and write, can learn to relate to each other. That's the challenge that we face. And the guns, and the bombs and the Contras are going in exactly the wrong direction.
What the Sister City program is to me is a human way to say to the people of Nicaragua, we're concerned about your problems, we respect you as human beings and we want to work with you cooperatively to build a decent world.
Thank you.
That would be cool, but I doubt it, EviL~Ryu.
(https://i.imgur.com/cmPHCLv.jpg)
Fidel Castro is a hero and he will live forever.
There is often talk of human rights, but it is also necessary to talk of the rights of humanity. Why should some people walk barefoot, so that others can travel in luxurious cars? Why should some live for thirty-five years, so that others can live for seventy years? Why should some be miserably poor, so that others can be hugely rich? I speak on behalf of the children in the world who do not have a piece of bread. I speak on the behalf of the sick who have no medicine, of those whose rights to life and human dignity have been denied.
— Fidel Castro's message to the UN General Assembly, 1979
([url]http://i.imgur.com/9KPGnxV.png[/url])
Veteran Ferguson protester Dhoruba Shakur flexing his right to open carry in Missouri with his gun and extended clip pic.twitter.com/GEOTBOaF8l
— Trymaine Lee (@trymainelee) March 11, 2016
https://vine.co/v/iejTDYi9z7U
(https://media.giphy.com/media/3o7abkti7UphSopcl2/giphy.gif)
lol, better than vs a communist [emoji23]
Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk
lol, better than vs a communist [emoji23]
Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk
You are actually retarded.
what happens to people like ryu when the revolution happens... reeducation camps i'd imagine.
https://www.change.org/p/quicken-loans-arena-allow-open-carry-of-firearms-at-the-quicken-loans-arena-during-the-rnc-convention-in-july-2 (https://www.change.org/p/quicken-loans-arena-allow-open-carry-of-firearms-at-the-quicken-loans-arena-during-the-rnc-convention-in-july-2)
hell yea
look it's a collection of war2's dumbest arguing mainstream politics.
I've been criticized for my big ideas. You know what wasn't too pie-in-the-sky for my opponent? $1.7 trillion to invade Iraq.
— Bernie Sanders (@BernieSanders) April 1, 2016
([url]http://i.imgur.com/ZqqZGBN.jpg[/url])
bill clinton hates black people now
BREAKING: The police in San Jose have appeared to lost control. Trump supporters being terrorized and beaten up by mobs of protestors.
— Tom Llamas (@LlamasNBC) June 3, 2016
"I don't have thin skin. I have very strong and very thick skin," Trump replied Friday. "I have a strong temperament. It's a very good temperament and it's a very in-control temperament, or I wouldn't have built this unbelievable company. I wouldn't have built all of the things I've been able to do in life."
([url]http://i.imgur.com/MAR4BHe.jpg[/url])
"I don't have thin skin. I have very strong and very thick skin," Trump replied Friday. "I have a strong temperament. It's a very good temperament and it's a very in-control temperament, or I wouldn't have built this unbelievable company. I wouldn't have built all of the things I've been able to do in life."lol
Trump says on Fox we need to greatly increase airstrikes overseas. Asked where, he pivots and doesn't answer -- says we need to hit the oil.
— Bradd Jaffy (@BraddJaffy) June 13, 2016
Also can we talk about the irony of The Daily Beast using an Orientalist photo of a dude with camels for this piece? pic.twitter.com/abmd5527gB
— Ben Norton (@BenjaminNorton) June 15, 2016
lolAlso can we talk about the irony of The Daily Beast using an Orientalist photo of a dude with camels for this piece? pic.twitter.com/abmd5527gB
— Ben Norton (@BenjaminNorton) June 15, 2016
([url]http://ddees.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Park.jpg[/url])
([url]http://ddees.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/CLUB.jpg[/url])
(https://media.giphy.com/media/l0K4bjEzZd6h5AHdu/giphy.gif)
Assad has killed vastly more civilians, but Boris Johnson says ISIS is "far, far worse." https://t.co/PtQcwWVW0M pic.twitter.com/Qzymbrccb8
— Kenneth Roth (@KenRoth) July 13, 2016
lol the director of the Human Rights Watch is an isis supporter)))
(https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/800/1*wz1_GP_GjXRCr-qfgHliTg.png)
(https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/800/1*rVhEjNBDvxVeWlONHRpdvQ.jpeg)
(https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/800/1*g2oKwdvqyCpqOyoju6Mb0w.png)Assad has killed vastly more civilians, but Boris Johnson says ISIS is "far, far worse." https://t.co/PtQcwWVW0M pic.twitter.com/Qzymbrccb8
— Kenneth Roth (@KenRoth) July 13, 2016
koch bros basically support clinton now lololol
koch bros basically support clinton now lololol
that's new?
koch bros basically support clinton now lololol
that's new?
Yes, because they usually support Republicans over Democrats, even relatively right-wing ones like Clinton.
I was a Nader Bro in 2000 and it was a reckless irresponsible abuse of privilege that I regret today. https://t.co/t75pbvCxs3
— David Carroll 🦣 (@profcarroll) July 27, 2016
Bernie delegate drove 22 hrs to be here. DNC denied him credentials this morning bc he held anti-TPP sign yesterday pic.twitter.com/JkVhoaI1Bp
— Rania Khalek (@RaniaKhalek) July 29, 2016
([url]http://i.imgur.com/ydg3sww.jpg[/url])
the really stupid thing about them silencing all these tpp protesters is that trump is against the tpp, hillary is gonna have to keep slamming the tpp for 3+ more months at this pointi haven't been following this circus , is hilary actually pretending to be against the TPP?
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cok8k2iWIAAwiQj.jpg:large)
([url]http://i63.tinypic.com/10mugjl.jpg[/url])
([url]http://i68.tinypic.com/2zegh2s.jpg[/url]) yeah i suck at photo shoping lol
Hezbollah chief Nasrallah approvingly quotes Trump: "Even the Republican leader said Obama and Clinton founded ISIS" pic.twitter.com/BwLltOPVu9
— Yaroslav Trofimov (@yarotrof) August 13, 2016
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CqbnJDOWEAARX0v.jpg)
Invalid Tweet ID
12-year-old running CO Trump campaign office made threatening calls to anti-Trump delegates https://t.co/CwaHhfHKti pic.twitter.com/Yz4sS6kbls
— Talking Points Memo (@TPM) August 22, 2016
I cannot stand to look upon Clinton's face. She's a madwoman, a warmonger, a corrupt, cruel creature. Why are people falling for her? Trump's no savior and he has his own share of issues, but he's not a traitor or corrupt. Say whatever you want about the man. Throw about words like sexist & racist. They are meaningless. Clinton's truly mad.
Racism and misogyny are laughable terms, imo. You would rather a woman who would plunge the world into war, whose every word is poison and a lie, over a man who offends people? Truly? Your priority is out of place. You choose feelings over rationality, it's peculiar. I will vote for the "racist" and "misogynist" every time over the murderer & corrupt madman/woman.I cannot stand to look upon Clinton's face. She's a madwoman, a warmonger, a corrupt, cruel creature. Why are people falling for her? Trump's no savior and he has his own share of issues, but he's not a traitor or corrupt. Say whatever you want about the man. Throw about words like sexist & racist. They are meaningless. Clinton's truly mad.
Clinton is all of those things, but Trump is a racist and a misogynist, those words aren't meaningless and they are bad things.
Also how is he not corrupt lol? Pretty weird that the "leftist" who doesn't think racism or misogyny matter also thinks "corrupt" is not a suitable adjective for the billionaire landlord...
Hillary Clinton is the more capitalistic of the twoI don't think so. Both are pretty hardcore capitalists.
While Americans savored the last moments of summer this Labor Day weekend, the U.S. military was busy overseas as warplanes conducted strikes in six countries in a flurry of attacks.Yeah, I know how vile & wicked American gov't is. America's government is twisted and corrupt to the core, espousing capitalism & "liberty" as its ideals, exporting them to developing countries and then bringing them to ruin, and any and all who dare defy them have "accidents" or have their enemies funded & trained by US forces. It's beyond despicable. ISIS exists because of America's funding & intervention. Regimes are toppled because of US intervention. America can't keep its secular, greedy hands out of everyone's cookie jar. Combine this with the obvious failure of the US Education system, the weakness shown throughout US military, and the destruction of the sacred to further secular & capitalistic goals, and I cannot help but agree when Islamists cry out "America is the Great Satan." They speak the truth. May God have mercy on the American people.
Where do you live and do you agree that socialism is the answer,While Americans savored the last moments of summer this Labor Day weekend, the U.S. military was busy overseas as warplanes conducted strikes in six countries in a flurry of attacks.Yeah, I know how vile & wicked American gov't is. America's government is twisted and corrupt to the core, espousing capitalism & "liberty" as its ideals, exporting them to developing countries and then bringing them to ruin, and any and all who dare defy them have "accidents" or have their enemies funded & trained by US forces. It's beyond despicable. ISIS exists because of America's funding & intervention. Regimes are toppled because of US intervention. America can't keep its secular, greedy hands out of everyone's cookie jar. Combine this with the obvious failure of the US Education system, the weakness shown throughout US military, and the destruction of the sacred to further secular & capitalistic goals, and I cannot help but agree when Islamists cry out "America is the Great Satan." They speak the truth. May God have mercy on the American people.
Racism and misogyny are laughable terms, imo. You would rather a woman who would plunge the world into war, whose every word is poison and a lie, over a man who offends people? Truly? Your priority is out of place. You choose feelings over rationality, it's peculiar. I will vote for the "racist" and "misogynist" every time over the murderer & corrupt madman/woman.
Trump isn't right or left. Many of his policies are far from right wing. He's a populist. A nationalist, but a nationalist can be right wing, left wing, or moderate.
You are a Marxist, yes? By your own Marxist standards, Hillary Clinton is the more capitalistic of the two. She's the antithesis of the Marxist. But because Trump's rhetoric is "scary" and "mean" you would rather her?
Where do you live and do you agree that socialism is the answer,While Americans savored the last moments of summer this Labor Day weekend, the U.S. military was busy overseas as warplanes conducted strikes in six countries in a flurry of attacks.Yeah, I know how vile & wicked American gov't is. America's government is twisted and corrupt to the core, espousing capitalism & "liberty" as its ideals, exporting them to developing countries and then bringing them to ruin, and any and all who dare defy them have "accidents" or have their enemies funded & trained by US forces. It's beyond despicable. ISIS exists because of America's funding & intervention. Regimes are toppled because of US intervention. America can't keep its secular, greedy hands out of everyone's cookie jar. Combine this with the obvious failure of the US Education system, the weakness shown throughout US military, and the destruction of the sacred to further secular & capitalistic goals, and I cannot help but agree when Islamists cry out "America is the Great Satan." They speak the truth. May God have mercy on the American people.
The content you crave
Invalid Tweet ID
(The Washington Post is an unabashed propaganda outlet now)
I live in United States. I do not believe socialism is the answer. I do not believe any ideology is the answer.Where do you live and do you agree that socialism is the answer,While Americans savored the last moments of summer this Labor Day weekend, the U.S. military was busy overseas as warplanes conducted strikes in six countries in a flurry of attacks.Yeah, I know how vile & wicked American gov't is. America's government is twisted and corrupt to the core, espousing capitalism & "liberty" as its ideals, exporting them to developing countries and then bringing them to ruin, and any and all who dare defy them have "accidents" or have their enemies funded & trained by US forces. It's beyond despicable. ISIS exists because of America's funding & intervention. Regimes are toppled because of US intervention. America can't keep its secular, greedy hands out of everyone's cookie jar. Combine this with the obvious failure of the US Education system, the weakness shown throughout US military, and the destruction of the sacred to further secular & capitalistic goals, and I cannot help but agree when Islamists cry out "America is the Great Satan." They speak the truth. May God have mercy on the American people.
Races are different, and each are able to maintain differing levels of civilization. We should not hate another because of their race or look down upon them. This is hatred, and unacceptable, but to acknowledge the differences in crime, IQ, sexual continence, delayed gratification, social cohesion, public health, honesty, this isn't hatred, it is simply reality.
Socialism, communism, fascism, democracy, etc. They aren't THE answer.
As for misogyny & racism: absolutely ridiculous. Races are different, and each are able to maintain differing levels of civilization.I guess you are an open racist? Because this is extremely racist.
Where do you live and do you agree that socialism is the answer,
I live in United States. I do not believe socialism is the answer. I do not believe any ideology is the answer.
The answer is in Jesus Christ & the Church.
Socialism, communism, fascism, democracy, etc. They aren't THE answer. They aren't going to resolve all our issues, they aren't going to mend the broken, uplift the downtrodden, or heal the wounded.
And, no, I don't think socialism of the nationalist variety is okay.
As for misogyny & racism: absolutely ridiculous. Races are different, and each are able to maintain differing levels of civilization. We should not hate another because of their race or look down upon them. This is hatred, and unacceptable, but to acknowledge the differences in crime, IQ, sexual continence, delayed gratification, social cohesion, public health, honesty, this isn't hatred, it is simply reality. None can be uplifted through an ideology. You will not help them, or save them, or make them into something greater.
Dudebros are gaslighting me by claiming that George W. Bush started the Iraq war pic.twitter.com/Qhbs7wxENo
— Beloved Dave (@neilkli) September 26, 2016
Chelsea Clinton implies here that marijuana can kill you. Uhh pic.twitter.com/cdBWGgDG5P
— Lee Fang (@lhfang) September 27, 2016
Ken Bone says he wore the red sweater as a plan B to the debate because he “split the seat of my pants wide open” https://t.co/H9eL2wi5as
— CNN (@CNN) October 10, 2016
Rudy is rallying "all of us losers, all of us deplorables, all of us morons."
— Ben Jacobs (@Bencjacobs) October 10, 2016
Lol thats epicRudy is rallying "all of us losers, all of us deplorables, all of us morons."
— Ben Jacobs (@Bencjacobs) October 10, 2016
The people of Cuba have struggled too long. Will reverse Obama's Executive Orders and concessions towards Cuba until freedoms are restored.
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 12, 2016
Gary Johnson: Climate Doesn't Matter because the Sun will Burn out in 4 billion years
seems like Gary Johnson is one stupid motherfucker.
I'm a Democrat and a Clinton supporter. I just gave $100 to help re-open Trump's NC office. https://t.co/zaxPXGBCM4 You should too.
— Clay Shirky (@cshirky) October 17, 2016
I'm sure they love having her support as well.
— the masked snooze (@Doc_Sneeze) October 26, 2016
Rudy is rallying "all of us losers, all of us deplorables, all of us morons."
— Ben Jacobs (@Bencjacobs) October 10, 2016
Can't wait for months of "if you don't vote for the wealthy Jew who supports Israel's right to exist and voted for Iraq sanctions to kill a million babies you're not a real leftist because he makes empty overtures to the working class," followed by months of "if you don't vote for this rich white woman who wants to keep holocausting the world for imperialism bux you're not a real leftist because she makes empty overtures to minorities"
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cv4yj6HWYAAgDc3.jpg)
North Carolina Is Engaging in “Insane” Jim Crow–Style Voter Suppression, Says Federal Judge
[url]http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2016/11/03/federal_judge_slams_north_carolina_voter_purge.html[/url] ([url]http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2016/11/03/federal_judge_slams_north_carolina_voter_purge.html[/url])
garbage state, garbage country.
([url]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CwWv2ZiXEAETyqX.jpg[/url])
([url]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CwW0rYGUcAEM9Mv.jpg[/url])
Tomorrow, don't for get to vote for the pile of meat covered in slime that best represents your shitty, one sided world view.
— Nihilist Arby's (@nihilist_arbys) November 7, 2016
Eat Arbys
UPDATED: Trump could take steps to try to jail Clinton, & his campaign manager wouldn't rule them out on TV this am https://t.co/FVwca2da39
— Matt Zapotosky (@mattzap) November 9, 2016
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cw1Qy4pXgAAPM6R.jpg)
People of color have been violently oppressed in America for over 500 years. We have never had a "post-racial" society.
— Dr. Jill Stein🌻 (@DrJillStein) November 10, 2016
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cw1Qy4pXgAAPM6R.jpg)
Every time I speak of the haters and losers I do so with great love and affection. They cannot help the fact that they were born fucked up!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 29, 2014
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cw_LofGXgAARnyo.jpg)
(https://i.redd.it/f6zg70gms1xx.png)
liberalism is a mental illness.
resist https://t.co/tpj9rcPF0Y
— David Grossman (@davidgross_man) November 14, 2016
([url]https://i.redd.it/tatwsgz6kdxx.jpg[/url])
([url]https://i.redd.it/tatwsgz6kdxx.jpg[/url])
([url]http://i.imgur.com/SWGZZA2.jpg[/url])
god fucking liberals pic.twitter.com/nDj6k0mLhs
— Adam Johnson (@adamjohnsonCHI) November 15, 2016
this is the best
([url]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CxUOjNSUUAAiVM5.jpg[/url])
god fucking liberals pic.twitter.com/nDj6k0mLhs
— Adam Johnson (@adamjohnsonCHI) November 15, 2016
liberalism overload
[/url]everything is the same and white supremacists are the same as progressive congressmen and nothing is objectively good or bad pic.twitter.com/Gr8U2uXYZp
— Adam Johnson (@adamjohnsonCHI) November 15, 2016
Total # of deaths connected to American Nazi Party in last quarter century: ZERO; Total # of deaths connected to Al Sharpton: 9 I know of.
— Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) November 22, 2016
I just looked into it and this checks out. I guess that means Nazis are good now.Total # of deaths connected to American Nazi Party in last quarter century: ZERO; Total # of deaths connected to Al Sharpton: 9 I know of.
— Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) November 22, 2016
! No longer available ([url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1o6-bi3jlxk#[/url])
dude actually said "cucks" , ;D
All real American men"Follow the Constitution"We don't follow another Country Constitution"
— alvarezmary3 (@alvarez787815) November 28, 2016