1921
Support Requests / Re: Forum BAN feature
« on: March 20, 2015, 08:09:05 PM »
Ban is unrelated to warning level, manually applied.
Welcome to the forums! We're glad to have you here! :) You can register your account here, then feel free to introduce yourself in the Server.Warcraft2.online board & let us know who you are on the server.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
1922
Server.War2.ru / Re: anti hack gold mine in different war2 versions
« on: March 20, 2015, 08:08:11 PM »
1923
Website & Forum Discussion / Re: forum games
« on: March 20, 2015, 11:18:39 AM »
I thought most of them did that?
1924
Website & Forum Discussion / Re: forum games
« on: March 20, 2015, 10:31:30 AM »
The fella over at docskillz.com was kind enough to fix the bugged gamepacks for us, so we now have Pacman and slightly-less-bad-Tetris, and a few other things.
1925
Website & Forum Discussion / Re: forum games
« on: March 19, 2015, 03:59:41 PM »
That's Tetris 2, I found it in another gamepack. There's another one that's just "Tetris" that was missing from pack 15 or 16. You can mute the sound, these are the controls:
The gameplay is just awful though, no hold queue, no bidirectional rotation, no soft drop ffs!
The gameplay is just awful though, no hold queue, no bidirectional rotation, no soft drop ffs!
1926
Website & Forum Discussion / Re: forum games
« on: March 19, 2015, 01:52:12 PM »
Deleted by popular demand to make room for more classic games. Unfortunately Gamepacks 15 & 16 were missing most the listed games, so no Tetris or Pacman. :c
1927
Server.War2.ru / Re: anti hack gold mine in different war2 versions
« on: March 19, 2015, 07:00:07 AM »
The only benefit of using the newer client is that gold mines show on the mini map when maphack is disabled? That sounds incredibly easy to edit out of a screenshot, and this sounds like a ton of unnecessary work for a very small payoff. iL's time and energy would be much better spent on his anti-hack project IMO. Better protection and no collateral damage.
1928
Server.War2.ru / Re: Discussion from: To close war2 clients except combat or not to close
« on: March 19, 2015, 06:48:53 AM »His vote definitely, definitely counts. If it makes you feel better, we can disqualify his vote, and I can vote to allow all clients in his place. Even though I largely want the hack version closed, I'll vote to keep it open just to make Teron-Gorefiend's vote count. It's stupid to disqualify him. His IP doesn't match with anyone else voting. He's played 400 games and played for 3 months. He's part of the community. He counts.
If you want to complain about a vote, complain about IBecomeShivaDestroyerOfGN.
I dont think we even have to talk about the destroyer guy, the fact is we should know everyone who vote and nobody know him.. This guys teron gorefiend is braggin since 4 month to be a smurf on his profile game.
I dont see why we gonna allow smurf just because hes playing longer then any other smurf.
My own opinion is take your vote because we all know you and its a fair vote even if you dont play.. But let's take in consideration even if you dont play, if your someone of this communauty we can allow you because you can start playing anytime and you are someone.
Great! So that means I get to vote after all. *goes to vote*
1929
Support Requests / Re: Vote on polls through Tapatalk
« on: March 19, 2015, 06:30:02 AM »
According to this, it's in the pipeline but there is "no definitive timeline". On iPhone there's an option to view as web that would probably let you see/vote on them.
1930
Website & Forum Discussion / Re: forum games
« on: March 18, 2015, 06:43:02 PM »
They're here: http://www.docskillz.com/docs/index.php?action=downloads;cat=2 Go ahead and pick any out you want. (You can pick individual games from packs.) I also read somewhere on that forum that a bunch of other game formats are compatible, like phpbb etc.
1931
Website & Forum Discussion / Re: forum games
« on: March 18, 2015, 05:51:05 PM »
This mod is really well put together, much better and simpler than a custom implementation. Installed w/ games packs 1 & 2, enjoy!
1932
Website & Forum Discussion / Re: Reputation Plug In??
« on: March 18, 2015, 03:46:00 PM »I also clicked the "applaud" link for an iL post and that in turn gave the post a thumbs up so the two are connected in both directions.Oh okay, cool. I wonder if that applies retroactively ? I tested if you can vote on the same post multiple times on your previous post, all three of those upvotes are from me, so doesn't seem to be any restriction there.
1933
Website & Forum Discussion / Re: Reputation Plug In??
« on: March 18, 2015, 03:27:38 PM »
Looks like the per post rating is a whole new feature in addition to the general score, which is just like people's overall opinion of you irrespective of individual posts. Now people can give positive or negative feedback on individual posts, and that rating also increments the total Karma score. The downside is that there's no limit to how many times an individual user can up or downvote a given post, so as with general Karma it's pretty easy to inflate the rankings.
1934
Support Requests / Re: locally hosted avatars lost?
« on: March 18, 2015, 03:18:14 PM »
They should be okay, some of the paths just changed related to migrating the site. I think I've gotten them all fixed now -- I couldn't see yours or mine before, now I can see both. What about you?
1935
Website & Forum Discussion / Re: Reputation Plug In??
« on: March 18, 2015, 01:47:44 PM »This mod adds two new links to the Karma system which you can see in each post. These links contain the number of smites and applauds a post has.
This mod has no configuration since it relies on SMF's karma system settings.
Well, let's give it a shot.