Warcraft II Forum

Help & Support => Website & Forum Discussion => Topic started by: I hate naggers on June 12, 2015, 01:25:49 PM

Title: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: I hate naggers on June 12, 2015, 01:25:49 PM
I don't know what kind of retard gave me the warning, but i didnt break the rules. if you dont know how to do your job - dont do it.
Cancel the warning and apologize




(http://i.imgur.com/fkFR70I.jpg)


(http://i.imgur.com/z7axvft.jpg)
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: Rit on June 12, 2015, 01:32:53 PM
What did you do specifically?
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: I hate naggers on June 12, 2015, 01:36:00 PM
http://forum.war2.ru/index.php?topic=1021.msg14613#msg14613 (http://forum.war2.ru/index.php?topic=1021.msg14613#msg14613)

Using niggers with the awareness that its not against the rules
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: Certified MENSA Genius Brain (smart) on June 12, 2015, 03:28:54 PM
There's a sticky thread in this forum by Mousetopher that says otherwise.

* Infraction details:
As of right now the official rules poll disallows "spam, obnoxious pictures, offtopic garbage"; "acts of religious, racial, sexual intolerance", and posting "porno links, pictures, videos onpage". My interpretation of this:
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: I hate naggers on June 12, 2015, 03:42:22 PM
As of right now the official rules poll
can't you read?

Quote
As of right now the official rules poll

it has CHANGED, my first post includes the official rules poll result for racism. And I included iLs words about the draw situation (7:7). The entire idea of the poll is that rules may change over time, and at the time of my post creation nothing i've done was against the rules. Revoke the ban & apologize, you stupid twat!
Title: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: EviL~Ryu on June 12, 2015, 03:47:32 PM
As of right now the official rules poll
can't you read?

Quote
As of right now the official rules poll

it has CHANGED, my first post includes the official rules poll result for racism. And I included iLs words about the draw situation (7:7). The entire idea of the poll is that rules may change over time, and at the time of my post creation nothing i've done was against the rules. Revoke the ban & apologize, you stupid twat!



Stop bitching and take the warning you fucking racist. Ass kissing not gonna get you out of this.


Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: I hate naggers on June 12, 2015, 03:54:03 PM
rules are rules. why are you even arguing with me, blid, you accused me of having OCD regarding the rules a month ago. It implies i am always right, so bend over, hide your pride in your pocket and give me the treatment and satisfaction i deserve
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: Certified MENSA Genius Brain (smart) on June 12, 2015, 04:01:15 PM
It's actually a 9:7 majority against allowing that kind of racism, with 7 wanting users like you muted and 2 wanting users like you banned.  And yet you received nothing more than a warning and are still protesting against it.  Fuck along, little buddy.
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: I hate naggers on June 12, 2015, 04:18:33 PM
thats not how democracy works. If the ban voters want their vote to matter, they should change to 'mute' or 'nothing'. We're only looking at the option with the MAJORITY of votes. Its draw -> weak side wins -> racism is allowed

Lets say theres 2 republican parties and 1 liberal

2 votes for republican A
7 votes for republican B

8 votes for liberal

liberal party wins.
2+7 dont magically sum up just because they represent a common point of view.
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: Certified MENSA Genius Brain (smart) on June 12, 2015, 04:23:02 PM
Lol damn dude that is pretty dumb.  "Democracy" does not mean "first past the post."  It takes many forms.
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: EviL~Ryu on June 12, 2015, 04:25:22 PM

rules are rules. why are you even arguing with me, blid, you accused me of having OCD regarding the rules a month ago. It implies i am always right, so bend over, hide your pride in your pocket and give me the treatment and satisfaction i deserve

"Fuck along little buddy"

Hahaha


Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: I hate naggers on June 12, 2015, 04:25:32 PM
no, you should be educated enough to realize that the poll's form of democracy will inevitably lead to the two party system (parties being mute and nothing). Permbanners are in the minority and are forced to choose the lesser evil. They havent yet. Revoke warn
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: Certified MENSA Genius Brain (smart) on June 12, 2015, 04:28:21 PM
You're trolling.
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: GaNzTheLegend on June 12, 2015, 04:33:00 PM
Claw had it coming

Sent from my SGH-I317M using Tapatalk

Title: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: EviL~Ryu on June 12, 2015, 04:33:55 PM
no, you should be educated enough to realize that the poll's form of democracy will inevitably lead to the two party system (parties being mute and nothing). Permbanners are in the minority and are forced to choose the lesser evil. They havent yet. Revoke warn

Take the punishment you wiener...like we all do. No special treatment for being polish and gay ...you wanted equal rights well now u got 'em.


Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: I hate naggers on June 12, 2015, 05:06:03 PM
rules are fucking rules, you DUMB FUCKING NIGGER

revoke the warn or permban me from the forum, thanks
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: EviL~Ryu on June 12, 2015, 05:13:23 PM

rules are fucking rules, you DUMB FUCKING NIGGER

revoke the warn or permban me from the forum, thanks

Rules are fucking rules...so bend over and take it like the homo you are!!!!


Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: I hate naggers on June 12, 2015, 05:26:38 PM
i will, read my post
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: mousEtopher on June 12, 2015, 05:29:10 PM
The guy's right, it doesn't matter what I wrote in that post, only what the current majority on the poll is. This:

It's actually a 9:7 majority against allowing that kind of racism, with 7 wanting users like you muted and 2 wanting users like you banned.  And yet you received nothing more than a warning and are still protesting against it.  Fuck along, little buddy.

is utter horseshit, lol. :P It's admittedly not a big deal, but if I didn't warn all those jerk-offs back when they were constantly calling me a bitch and a cunt and spewing various other shit because "insulting was not against the rules" then Claw doesn't merit a warning for saying "nigger", because "racism isn't against the rules", whether you like him or not. I'm reversing it.
Title: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: EviL~Ryu on June 12, 2015, 05:33:36 PM
The guy's right, it doesn't matter what I wrote in that post, only what the current majority on the poll is. This:

It's actually a 9:7 majority against allowing that kind of racism, with 7 wanting users like you muted and 2 wanting users like you banned.  And yet you received nothing more than a warning and are still protesting against it.  Fuck along, little buddy.

is utter horseshit, lol. :P It's admittedly not a big deal, but if I didn't warn all those jerk-offs back when they were constantly calling me a bitch and a cunt and spewing various other shit because "insulting was not against the rules" then Claw doesn't merit a warning for saying "nigger", because "racism isn't against the rules", whether you like him or not. I'm reversing it.

Expected. Hahahhahahah.

Da sex must be that good between these two...

Must be nice having a pocket bitch to come to  his rescue when he cries.


Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: Certified MENSA Genius Brain (smart) on June 12, 2015, 05:39:34 PM
The guy's right, it doesn't matter what I wrote in that post, only what the current majority on the poll is. This:

It's actually a 9:7 majority against allowing that kind of racism, with 7 wanting users like you muted and 2 wanting users like you banned.  And yet you received nothing more than a warning and are still protesting against it.  Fuck along, little buddy.

is utter horseshit, lol. :P It's admittedly not a big deal, but if I didn't warn all those jerk-offs back when they were constantly calling me a bitch and a cunt and spewing various other shit because "insulting was not against the rules" then Claw doesn't merit a warning for saying "nigger", because "racism isn't against the rules", whether you like him or not. I'm reversing it.

Oh my fucking god.
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: mousEtopher on June 12, 2015, 05:44:12 PM
The guy's right, it doesn't matter what I wrote in that post, only what the current majority on the poll is. This:

It's actually a 9:7 majority against allowing that kind of racism, with 7 wanting users like you muted and 2 wanting users like you banned.  And yet you received nothing more than a warning and are still protesting against it.  Fuck along, little buddy.

is utter horseshit, lol. :P It's admittedly not a big deal, but if I didn't warn all those jerk-offs back when they were constantly calling me a bitch and a cunt and spewing various other shit because "insulting was not against the rules" then Claw doesn't merit a warning for saying "nigger", because "racism isn't against the rules", whether you like him or not. I'm reversing it.

Expected. Hahahhahahah.

Da sex must be that good between these two...

Must be nice having a pocket bitch to come to  his rescue when he cries.


Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk

Also expected. *shrug* Oh my fucking god at your "muting + banning votes get combined", blid. I mean, really? lol I don't play favorites, so you shouldn't either.
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: I hate naggers on June 12, 2015, 05:48:04 PM
all you have to do is find the people who voted on "permban" and convince them to vote on "mute". the law cant be "reversed" so i wont be punished for the current niggers, but all the future niggers should and will be punished then.

how can you be a lawyer and not grasp the concept of rules? youre the troll here. I was against most of the rules presented by il, but i said specifically - i can adapt as long as they will be followed. the logic is there, take your time
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: Certified MENSA Genius Brain (smart) on June 12, 2015, 05:48:40 PM
There were 9 people that voted for racism to be punished.  There were 7 people that voted for it not to be punished.  You actually agree with Claw's jerk-off logic that "democracy" therefore says it shouldn't be punished, despite there being a majority saying it should be?  That is asinine.  You prefer to deliberately ignore the voters' statement that they want to punish racism, simply because they voted for two separate punishments - when the warning system we use doesn't employ either of those punishments anyway?  Why would we do that?  Simply to emulate some broken systems that exist in the real world?  I'm incredulous here. 
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: Certified MENSA Genius Brain (smart) on June 12, 2015, 05:51:49 PM
The guy's right, it doesn't matter what I wrote in that post, only what the current majority on the poll is. This:

It's actually a 9:7 majority against allowing that kind of racism, with 7 wanting users like you muted and 2 wanting users like you banned.  And yet you received nothing more than a warning and are still protesting against it.  Fuck along, little buddy.

is utter horseshit, lol. :P It's admittedly not a big deal, but if I didn't warn all those jerk-offs back when they were constantly calling me a bitch and a cunt and spewing various other shit because "insulting was not against the rules" then Claw doesn't merit a warning for saying "nigger", because "racism isn't against the rules", whether you like him or not. I'm reversing it.

Expected. Hahahhahahah.

Da sex must be that good between these two...

Must be nice having a pocket bitch to come to  his rescue when he cries.


Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk

Also expected. *shrug* Oh my fucking god at your "muting + banning votes get combined", blid. I mean, really? lol I don't play favorites, so you shouldn't either.
Yes, really.  How can you not see this?  We don't mute or ban (except for repeated offenses), so who cares which punishment people voted for?  I can't believe you're publicly calling out my logic as horseshit when it's, you know, common fucking sense imo. 

Oh, a majority of people wanted to punish for this, but since they voted for two separate punishments, then we'd better just do the complete opposite of what they voted for and allow it!  <--- apparently NOT horseshit logic.
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: I hate naggers on June 12, 2015, 05:53:11 PM
rules cant be flexible. As for now. 7 > 2. 7 = 7. Facts.

Quote
Simply to emulate some broken systems that exist in the real world?
Using that logic you may change any vote REGARDLESS OF NUMBERS (as you do here) for example because you consider some of the votes "trollish", or "not serious". You've already tried doing that in the "should other clients be closed" poll, where the option "allow all" has won. apparently its YOU who doesnt respect polls and their numbers, all you care about is to have things done your way
Title: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: EviL~Ryu on June 12, 2015, 05:53:42 PM
The guy's right, it doesn't matter what I wrote in that post, only what the current majority on the poll is. This:

It's actually a 9:7 majority against allowing that kind of racism, with 7 wanting users like you muted and 2 wanting users like you banned.  And yet you received nothing more than a warning and are still protesting against it.  Fuck along, little buddy.

is utter horseshit, lol. :P It's admittedly not a big deal, but if I didn't warn all those jerk-offs back when they were constantly calling me a bitch and a cunt and spewing various other shit because "insulting was not against the rules" then Claw doesn't merit a warning for saying "nigger", because "racism isn't against the rules", whether you like him or not. I'm reversing it.

Expected. Hahahhahahah.

Da sex must be that good between these two...

Must be nice having a pocket bitch to come to  his rescue when he cries.


Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk

Also expected. *shrug* Oh my fucking god at your "muting + banning votes get combined", blid. I mean, really? lol I don't play favorites, so you shouldn't either.


Fucking bullshit you don't play favorites. Ha! Never met a compulsive lair as yourself.

This rodent needs to be skinned and fed to the cats for her sins.


TK was wise to see her power abuse early in the game.


Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: Certified MENSA Genius Brain (smart) on June 12, 2015, 05:54:56 PM
all you have to do is find the people who voted on "permban" and convince them to vote on "mute". the law cant be "reversed" so i wont be punished for the current niggers, but all the future niggers should and will be punished then.

how can you be a lawyer and not grasp the concept of rules? youre the troll here. I was against most of the rules presented by il, but i said specifically - i can adapt as long as they will be followed. the logic is there, take your time
This is not how all democratic systems work!  In fact, what you're suggesting is a known flawed system and there's no reason for us to adhere to it.
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: I hate naggers on June 12, 2015, 05:58:20 PM
whats stopping you from asking the permban voters to change their vote? Or, if theres more than 2 options regarding a specific case, pick two options with the most votes and have people vote? there's really no simpler thing than direct democracy

actually, i believe there was a possibility to vote for TWO of the options, so muting+banning was an option. that makes your claims even more retarded
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: Certified MENSA Genius Brain (smart) on June 12, 2015, 06:02:48 PM
whats stopping you from asking the permban voters to change their vote? Or, if theres more than 2 options regarding a specific case, pick two options with the most votes and have people vote? there's really no simpler thing than direct democracy
Why should they have to?  Let everyone vote for what they most want.  The people voting for bans have made their opinion clear, they do NOT think racism should be permitted.  Do you suggest we just pretend we're morons who can't understand that, or idiots who can't add?  Why should we do that?
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: Certified MENSA Genius Brain (smart) on June 12, 2015, 06:05:44 PM
Why would anyone vote for muting AND banning?  If you're banning a person, they don't need to be muted, so that doesn't even make sense.  Why are you asking us to pretend we're all stupid?  Why are you asking us to ignore the will of the voters - the opinion of the majority?  What ideal are we upholding by telling two people who voted to ban for racism that, you know, they need to go change their vote to muting for racism, or else racism will be allowed?  This is nonsensical logic and I completely reject it and am bewildered by Mousetopher buying in to your nonsense. 
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: EviL~Ryu on June 12, 2015, 06:07:38 PM

The guy's right, it doesn't matter what I wrote in that post, only what the current majority on the poll is. This:

It's actually a 9:7 majority against allowing that kind of racism, with 7 wanting users like you muted and 2 wanting users like you banned.  And yet you received nothing more than a warning and are still protesting against it.  Fuck along, little buddy.

is utter horseshit, lol. :P It's admittedly not a big deal, but if I didn't warn all those jerk-offs back when they were constantly calling me a bitch and a cunt and spewing various other shit because "insulting was not against the rules" then Claw doesn't merit a warning for saying "nigger", because "racism isn't against the rules", whether you like him or not. I'm reversing it.

Expected. Hahahhahahah.

Da sex must be that good between these two...

Must be nice having a pocket bitch to come to  his rescue when he cries.


Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk

Also expected. *shrug* Oh my fucking god at your "muting + banning votes get combined", blid. I mean, really? lol I don't play favorites, so you shouldn't either.
Yes, really.  How can you not see this?  We don't mute or ban (except for repeated offenses), so who cares which punishment people voted for?  I can't believe you're publicly calling out my logic as horseshit when it's, you know, common fucking sense imo. 

Oh, a majority of people wanted to punish for this, but since they voted for two separate punishments, then we'd better just do the complete opposite of what they voted for and allow it!  <--- apparently NOT horseshit logic.


Don't feel to bad, she did the same thing to TK a few months ago...I'd probably thank her for his leaving. Sad, iL and the community puts up with his useless bitch.


Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: I hate naggers on June 12, 2015, 06:10:22 PM
My logic: 7 = 7.

Your logic: yeah, numbers say one thing, but the votes meant something else, i mean... i think they would have voted differently if... and i choose lesser evil for them which is... (...) to conclude, one seven is bigger than the other.
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: I hate naggers on June 12, 2015, 06:12:02 PM
and now, the final blow. Check out these two votes:

No moderation for both server & forum [2]

now get the fuck out and stop embarassing yourself.
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: Certified MENSA Genius Brain (smart) on June 12, 2015, 06:15:01 PM
actually your logic is "we must do the opposite of what the majority wanted, and allow racism."  i literally thought you were trolling, the argument was so bad.  no matter what punishment people voted for, the majority wanted to punish for racism, so why should we allow it?  why should i not warn for it? 

i do not have to "think they would have voted differently if."  they actually DID vote not to allow racism.  both the mute people and the ban people DID VOTE AGAINST ALLOWING RACISM.  you are being deliberately stupid to ignore that.
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: GaNzTheLegend on June 12, 2015, 06:16:37 PM
Claw crys too much

Sent from my SGH-I317M using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: Certified MENSA Genius Brain (smart) on June 12, 2015, 06:17:17 PM
i cant fucking believe mouse came in here and unilaterally overruled me and backed up claws terrible nonsense argument.
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: I hate naggers on June 12, 2015, 06:17:53 PM
actually your logic is "we must do the opposite of what the majority wanted, and allow racism."  i literally thought you were trolling, the argument was so bad.  no matter what punishment people voted for, the majority wanted to punish for racism, so why should we allow it?  why should i not warn for it? 

i do not have to "think they would have voted differently if."  they actually DID vote not to allow racism.  both the mute people and the ban people DID VOTE AGAINST ALLOWING RACISM.  you are being deliberately stupid to ignore that.

get a magnifying glass, check out my last post and gtfo, make a whore of logic AND rules somewhere else
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: EviL~Ryu on June 12, 2015, 06:19:20 PM

Claw crys too much

Sent from my SGH-I317M using Tapatalk

OMG finally someone noticed...


Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk
Title: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: EviL~Ryu on June 12, 2015, 06:21:11 PM
i cant fucking believe mouse came in here and unilaterally overruled me and backed up claws terrible nonsense argument.

This isn't her first time bro...go back in the archives you can see she did the same thing to TK. Kind of confused how we can overrule you...just because she made this forum...which anyone could...she has title of admin. Hmm sad.


Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: GaNzTheLegend on June 12, 2015, 06:21:50 PM
i cant fucking believe mouse came in here and unilaterally overruled me and backed up claws terrible nonsense argument.
Sarcasm?

Sent from my SGH-I317M using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: Certified MENSA Genius Brain (smart) on June 12, 2015, 06:23:57 PM
actually your logic is "we must do the opposite of what the majority wanted, and allow racism."  i literally thought you were trolling, the argument was so bad.  no matter what punishment people voted for, the majority wanted to punish for racism, so why should we allow it?  why should i not warn for it? 

i do not have to "think they would have voted differently if."  they actually DID vote not to allow racism.  both the mute people and the ban people DID VOTE AGAINST ALLOWING RACISM.  you are being deliberately stupid to ignore that.

get a magnifying glass, check out my last post and gtfo, make a whore of logic AND rules somewhere else
Lol there is nothing wrong with my logic.  My argument is so far above yours it's stupid, which is what makes this so annoying.

ok, you found 2 other votes.  But that doesn't make everything you've said here so far not stupid.  It's still all stupid to deliberately ignore voters wanting racism banned because they voted for two separate punishments, and to do the exact opposite of what they voted for.  that is literally a perversion of democracy and you're in here calling for democracy.

So, can we add in those 2 other votes?  idk, I can't see who voted, so i don't know if those two people who voted for that could have also gone down the list and voted "should cause nothing" which would then mean you are counting them twice.  I can't see to know, though
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: I hate naggers on June 12, 2015, 06:25:39 PM
YES, I "FOUND" two votes! LOL, and you still fail to notice how retarded it is, right? Searching for votes which may support our stance, adding, multiplying, subtracting? Looking for people intentions behind other votes instead of focusing on plain numbers? Get outta here before I start posting porn and you get fired from work.

how?
(http://i.imgur.com/VBvvXLy.jpg)

You may notice that 7 is bigger than 5. However, this is not the case here, blid doesnt believe in numbers. What we gotta do is find other votes that are closer to the spectrum we want. In this case, we pull a rabbit outta our asses and add two extra votes to the option we want from here:

No moderation for both server & forum
    2 (1.3%)

Now its 7:7, draw, meaning porn is allowed, no [nsfw] tags needed.
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: Certified MENSA Genius Brain (smart) on June 12, 2015, 06:26:39 PM
Claw in here trying to throw out people's votes so he can preserve his right to call people nigger, lol.  seriously.
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: I hate naggers on June 12, 2015, 06:27:27 PM
oh shut up nigger, its more than that
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: Certified MENSA Genius Brain (smart) on June 12, 2015, 06:28:17 PM
Hm, 2 people voted that we should ban for racism.  I wonder if those people want racism to be allowed or not, this is so hard to interpret, how can we possibly divine their intention?  Im a retarded ass person.
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: I hate naggers on June 12, 2015, 06:29:53 PM
7 = 7 is the truth. You trying to question that flawless logic, which is a self own. but even if you do, you still lose 9 = 9, you dumb retard. Thats a double self own. whos retarded here?

[ ]claw
[x ]blid
[x ]blid^2
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: Certified MENSA Genius Brain (smart) on June 12, 2015, 06:31:11 PM
Hm, 2 people voted that we should ban for racism.  I wonder if those people want racism to be allowed or not, this is so hard to interpret, how can we possibly divine their intention?  Im a retarded ass person.
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: I hate naggers on June 12, 2015, 06:33:07 PM
ok, between ganz complaining about how forum is inactive, and the same ganz complaining that i cry too much, i hereby announce that this discussion is over and i no longer have 10% warn. I called blid a retard, he calls himself a retard, so the general consensus is that blid is a retard. I also believe the votes will change soon, prohibiting racism once more
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: EviL~Ryu on June 12, 2015, 06:35:11 PM

Claw in here trying to throw out people's votes so he can preserve his right to call people nigger, lol.  seriously.

It's ridiculous but his pocket bitch ensures that he can say what he wants and do what he wants without punishment.


Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk
Title: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: EviL~Ryu on June 12, 2015, 06:36:51 PM
ok, between ganz complaining about how forum is inactive, and the same ganz complaining that i cry too much, i hereby announce that this discussion is over and i no longer have 10% warn. I called blid a retard, he calls himself a retard, so the general consensus is that blid is a retard. I also believe the votes will change soon, prohibiting racism once more

Who the fuck are you to make such an assertion towards a moderator. Just because your mouseys pet gives you the right to do anything you want?



Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: I hate naggers on June 12, 2015, 06:38:11 PM
oh pardon me, i've been punished once. For telling equinox that "killing himself might be the only option if he sees things this way" in a huge trolling thread. I got warned because he (blid) got trolled, yet it made more sense than this warn, yes. LOL

Oh blid, while youre at it, you might as well apologize for that one too
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: EviL~Ryu on June 12, 2015, 06:40:25 PM

oh pardon me, i've been punished once. For telling equinox that "killing himself might be the only option if he sees things this way" in a huge trolling thread. I got warned because he (blid) got trolled, yet it made more sense than this warn, yes. LOL

Oh blid, while youre at it, you might as well apologize for that one too

Bullshit.


Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: I hate naggers on June 12, 2015, 06:41:54 PM
i would gladly own you, but theres no point. The (relatively) smart ones here, with a memory capacity higher than pidgeons, remember it clearly
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: EviL~Ryu on June 12, 2015, 06:43:12 PM

i would gladly own you, but theres no point. The (relatively) smart ones here, with a memory capacity higher than pidgeons, remember it clearly

I was referring to anything that you say from that asshole you call a mouth is bullshit.


Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: CumSavorer4385 on June 12, 2015, 06:58:50 PM
This thread is why all Poles are retards who need to be exterminated for the good of the human race.
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: EviL~Ryu on June 12, 2015, 07:07:06 PM

This thread is why all Poles are retards who need to be exterminated for the good of the human race.

Mostly just the ass kissing ones, and corresponding rodents.


Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: I hate naggers on June 12, 2015, 07:10:40 PM
how am i a bad guy in this thread. I am the lawful one, protecting people from bad mod decisions
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: Rit on June 12, 2015, 07:20:59 PM
I have personally taken a liking to Claw because most of his trolling actually makes a lot of logical sense and challenges a lot of flaws in this community.  I feel he is a voice of reason that we need here.  However, I do think he can be a little out there at times.  I don't think that's the case in this situation though. 

I'm not here to make enemies but I really think the admins could be handling themselves a lot better than they are here.  It seems blid likes to take things into his own hands and only consider his own view most of the time to make decisions with a disregard for the actual rules and punishments (I do think he resolved the Evil~Ryu bot situation well after talking with him though).  As for mouse, I think she would be less likely to defend anyone else the way she did for Claw here.  I also think she's less likely to punish him even if he does break the rules (maybe I assume too much here?).  I, too, would probably be guilty of something like this if I were an admin and had a close friend on the forum.  I know this isn't an easy job to have, especially when you have people raging against you and also breaking the rules.  Some situations can be tough to judge and we don't realize our mistakes until there is outrage over it.  I just wish the admins would take a more humble stance when dealing with these situations without having to argue and even become upset with one another.  We have one admin who decided to make a decision himself without consulting the others and now we have an admin who decided to take it into their own hands to reverse his decision, again, without consulting the others. This does not seem efficient to me.  When I started posting on this forum, it was a huge mess.  There was a lot of name calling and crying about who isn't doing what and what should be done without anyone taking it into their own hands.  All this does it make us all stagnate here in a negative way and nothing gets done.  I felt that the fact that I took a positive outlook and didn't give into such negative thinking calmed things down from that time.  Those wielding any power here should take a more humble approach and have tough skin.  Giving into the members of the forum who resort to name calling by responding to them with hostility is not the way to go.  I take those members less seriously and the admins less seriously for giving into it

So, as for the situation of Claw using the word "nigger", it looks like it should result in a mute by the one's who are particularly offended judging by the votes in the rules poll.  It's nothing more than just a word.  It's not like he got on here and started ranting in order to offend black people in general or even deliberately directing it toward a black person with it's intended meaning.  Even they use the word freely with one another.  So if someone gets on the forum here and calls someone his "nigga", does that then result in a warning or a ban?  I think not. 

Could we resolve this as adults without resorting to the hostilities?

Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: I hate naggers on June 12, 2015, 07:35:54 PM
Even they use the word freely with one another.  So if someone gets on the forum here and calls someone his "nigga", does that then result in a warning or a ban?  I think not. 

that shouldnt be the case here. I see you like tk[as] approach (sit down on my lap, lad, and lets talk this through), but its overall crappy, admin and mood swing dependant, also no transparent rules leave room for abuse.

Rules should be global, no exceptions. No "hes depressed, tread lightly", no "his father just died, give him a break", no "he didnt mean it in this way or that way".
Rules should be respected. Rules are the ones with the most votes. Period. No ideology, no overanalysis, no personal interpretations of people votes and intentions. Anyone is free to vote on whatever he wants, anyone is free to change the vote at any time.
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: Certified MENSA Genius Brain (smart) on June 12, 2015, 08:36:07 PM
I just wish the admins would take a more humble stance when dealing with these situations without having to argue and even become upset with one another.  We have one admin who decided to make a decision himself without consulting the others
At the time the rules thread was posted, calling people nigger wasn't allowed.  It's normal for me to see someone breaking the rules and to click the warn button.  I don't know if Claw noticed the poll had changed and started saying nigger on purpose, but it's something that wasn't allowed before so I gave a simple harmless warning that does nothing.  Claw then, because it is his nature, makes his complaint thread and starts his crusade to get the harmless warning overturned because apparently a vote got changed on the poll, and he lives for finding stuff to poke at in the rules.  He's just ridiculous about stuff like that.  It was also pretty out of character for Mousetopher to come in and call my posts horseshit without talking it over with me or anyone else first.

Rules should be global, no exceptions. No "hes depressed, tread lightly", no "his father just died, give him a break", no "he didnt mean it in this way or that way".
And this is totally autistic thinking, and people like you are exactly the reason why rules operating that way is bad.  Maybe for like a national government you gotta run things like that but this is a small messageboard.  If you have trustworthy people making judgments then it can be done very well.  "Hey, I can tell this depressed person to commit suicide, because there doesn't seem to be a rule against it.  So let me try to get this guy to kill himself, and there's nothing you can do to stop me."    <-------- Objectively bad
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: Winchester on June 12, 2015, 09:51:27 PM
why so mad bro, did the truth sting you so hard or what? You racist!


i just told you why youre a mental nutcase, provided you with arguments and instead of trying to defend yourself, youre being an even bigger, racist nutcase. I win

Funny how the roles have reversed now in not even a week eh mr non racist claw?
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: Equinox on June 13, 2015, 12:58:58 AM
She ban me from lie and now she unbann claw from racism lol

Worst mod ever after light for sure.
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: I hate naggers on June 13, 2015, 01:26:39 AM
Maybe for like a national government you gotta run things like that but this is a small messageboard

And the example of your way of thinking is what... equinox trolling your ass very hard and you punishing an innocent little sweet dude (me) with a warning? you've had it your way once and failed. 100% failure rate.

oh wait, theres another! bhc-master trolling your asses for MONTHS about his hacking neighbours, sisters, brothers, dogs, wifi-thiefs and so on. every time you believed him and let him break the rules. he finally spilled the beans after you banned him and it turned out he has a major MPD. another fail of your judgement, innocent little sweet dudes were being hacked by him for months(!) with no punishment whatsoever

No ss = warning <--- this is a good, simple rule
No ss = warning unless you have a brother <--- millions of people hacking and pretending to have brothers. We've all seen it. what you gona do, ask for their and their siblings ID scans? family photos? aint you stupid.

eh mr non racist claw?
a black person on the street looked at me funny
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: I hate naggers on June 13, 2015, 02:06:23 AM
Quote
it's something that wasn't allowed before so I gave a simple harmless warning that does nothing.  Claw then, because it is his nature, makes his complaint thread and starts his crusade to get the harmless warning overturned because apparently a vote got changed on the poll, and he lives for finding stuff to poke at in the rules.  He's just ridiculous about stuff like that.  It was also pretty out of character for Mousetopher to come in and call my posts horseshit without talking it over with me or anyone else first.

>be blid
>punishing people without consulting anybody
>turned out i was wrong
>verdict? Good moderation
>mousetopher took away the unjust warning i gave to somebody
>Verdict? bad moderation, because she didnt consult anyone!

(https://imgflip.com/s/meme/Black-Girl-Wat.jpg)


Someone is very proud and powerhungry here!
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: Equinox on June 13, 2015, 02:48:06 AM
Equinox troll nobody, Equinox just think admins are retards to let hackers and dumb fucker like you do what they want.
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: Warchief Lightbringer- on June 13, 2015, 04:59:57 AM
Claw is a trolling racist. I have been at the "receiving end" of his abuses for a long time. He did not get banned on the server by me for it but I can assure you, it is totally unacceptable here. I am with Blid on this one. Posts stay and it is the last thing I want people to see when they come here. Pics of 1 inch Quebec cocks are also not appropriate.
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: I hate naggers on June 13, 2015, 05:37:22 AM
He did not get banned on the server by me
well, youve been kicking me off the channel and posting my IP. But no ban, youre right!

It doesnt matter what you "want", because people make the rules here. Mods execute them.
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: Equinox on June 13, 2015, 06:46:34 AM
Claw is a trolling racist. I have been at the "receiving end" of his abuses for a long time. He did not get banned on the server by me for it but I can assure you, it is totally unacceptable here. I am with Blid on this one. Posts stay and it is the last thing I want people to see when they come here. Pics of 1 inch Quebec cocks are also not appropriate.

I will post my 1inch cock with a spoiler if i want too.

Hacking is not appropriate, remove yourself please.
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: Certified MENSA Genius Brain (smart) on June 13, 2015, 07:59:26 AM
Quote
it's something that wasn't allowed before so I gave a simple harmless warning that does nothing.  Claw then, because it is his nature, makes his complaint thread and starts his crusade to get the harmless warning overturned because apparently a vote got changed on the poll, and he lives for finding stuff to poke at in the rules.  He's just ridiculous about stuff like that.  It was also pretty out of character for Mousetopher to come in and call my posts horseshit without talking it over with me or anyone else first.

>be blid
>punishing people without consulting anybody
>turned out i was wrong
>verdict? Good moderation
>mousetopher took away the unjust warning i gave to somebody
>Verdict? bad moderation, because she didnt consult anyone!
lol you're such a troll and it's like not just are you trolling, you're totally wrong about shit.  moderators don't typically have to consult other moderators before taking basic moderator actions, ie giving a warning for a post we deem to need moderation.  no other mod here asks me before giving a warning for a post and i dont ask them.  however, if one mod disagrees with the decision of another, it is basically unheard of to just publicly blow them up without even discussing it.  this is all common sense. 

also this is probably the only board in history where there's a poll from 6 months ago that dictates the rules but people are quietly changing/adding votes on it six months later and now the rules are apparently dfferent without anyone noticing so you mount your retard "undo my harmless warning or permaban me" campaign just because either you love causing trouble or you're autistic.
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: Winchester on June 13, 2015, 08:05:49 AM
. Pics of 1 inch Quebec cocks are also not appropriate.

Lmao, guess theres another reason that his 'girlfriend' left him
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: I hate naggers on June 13, 2015, 08:22:10 AM
you're totally wrong about shit.

How can we both be wrong? We cant, and its already established that you were in the wrong here and your decision was incorrect.

Quote
also this is probably the only board in history where there's a poll from 6 months ago that dictates the rules but people are quietly changing/adding votes on it six months later and now the rules are apparently dfferent without anyone noticing

I like your second paragraph, though, slowly shifting the blame onto iL for your laziness to check the rules and further INABILITY to admit your mistake and apologize. Simply apologize to the little buddy claw

(http://adesivifacebook.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/hatch-arancione-smile.png)
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: Certified MENSA Genius Brain (smart) on June 13, 2015, 08:31:56 AM
id sooner give you another warning
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: I hate naggers on June 13, 2015, 08:35:26 AM
you suck then! give up the forum moderation for the time being and take care of that channel bot spammer. Idk if he stole those accounts, but he made the entire chat flood enter/leave msges, normal messages and everything was lagging hard. Maybe still is, duno
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: GaNzTheLegend on June 13, 2015, 09:34:31 AM
Claw and mouse against the world

Sent from my SGH-I317M using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: EviL~Ryu on June 13, 2015, 12:28:55 PM

Claw and mouse against the world

Sent from my SGH-I317M using Tapatalk

Favoritism is wrong.


Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: I hate naggers on June 13, 2015, 12:39:11 PM
personally i pay no attention to the exact amount of retards refusing to grasp the truth here
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: GaNzTheLegend on June 13, 2015, 01:22:40 PM
personally i pay no attention to the exact amount of retards refusing to grasp the truth here
What truth

Sent from my SGH-I317M using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: EviL~Ryu on June 13, 2015, 01:28:15 PM

personally i pay no attention to the exact amount of retards refusing to grasp the truth here
What truth

Sent from my SGH-I317M using Tapatalk

That he humps rodents.


Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: iL on June 15, 2015, 04:42:11 AM
([url]http://i.imgur.com/fkFR70I.jpg[/url])
[/img]

Wow, "nothing" reached "muting"!
How'd that happen?..

Well, i agree with Claw. These rules about banning, muting and nothing have been probably formulated with logical mistake, but here it is. We should interpret that in behalf of defendant.

It's actually a 9:7 majority against allowing that kind of racism

I also checked the votes: 1 person voted for banning+muting+nothing at the same time, so we can decrease 1 vote from each line. We have 1 person voted for banning but not for muting, i'll ask him about to add his vote for muting if he wants also...

Another question is should we consider banned people votes (like USA~Archer) or not.
Another question is should we consider critters' votes or not.
I think still yes. They don't play some decisive part in total results. Maybe just 1-2 votes on both sides.

Maybe someone concerned can enforce the petition to attract people to vote for rules in bnet chat?
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: I hate naggers on June 15, 2015, 05:32:05 AM
All this buttsex with iL finally paying off, hell yeah!

The elite team Claw & mousetopher: 1
Rest of the newbie world: 0

>Another question is should we consider banned people votes (like USA~Archer) or not.
if theyre no longer part of the forum (PERMBAN) then i think the votes should be deleted, as permban is equivalent to account closure basically. Tempbanned votes should stay. Its not like permban happens every day :P

>Another question is should we consider critters' votes or not.
critter? yes, as long as the account is not a multiacc (and is a real user/IP match on war2.ru). So far only ganz was dumb enough to create forum smurfs, but who knows with this community
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: EviL~Ryu on June 15, 2015, 09:49:49 AM
Funny how you believe Ganz was the only one to create forum smurfs...lmao




Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: GaNzTheLegend on June 15, 2015, 01:21:31 PM
All this buttsex with iL finally paying off, hell yeah!

The elite team Claw & mousetopher: 1
Rest of the newbie world: 0

>Another question is should we consider banned people votes (like USA~Archer) or not.
if theyre no longer part of the forum (PERMBAN) then i think the votes should be deleted, as permban is equivalent to account closure basically. Tempbanned votes should stay. Its not like permban happens every day

>Another question is should we consider critters' votes or not.
critter? yes, as long as the account is not a multiacc (and is a real user/IP match on war2.ru). So far only ganz was dumb enough to create forum smurfs, but who knows with this community
Dumb? I think it was smart. It got the karma removed like I wanted and was funny seeing u and smurfking, and blid with -100 rep

Sent from my SGH-I317M using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: I hate naggers on June 15, 2015, 01:26:38 PM
my -100 rep was legit, you werent downvoting my posts
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: CumSavorer4385 on June 17, 2015, 12:27:51 PM
I have personally taken a liking to Claw because most of his trolling actually makes a lot of logical sense and challenges a lot of flaws in this community.  I feel he is a voice of reason that we need here.  However, I do think he can be a little out there at times.  I don't think that's the case in this situation though. 

I'm not here to make enemies but I really think the admins could be handling themselves a lot better than they are here.  It seems blid likes to take things into his own hands and only consider his own view most of the time to make decisions with a disregard for the actual rules and punishments (I do think he resolved the Evil~Ryu bot situation well after talking with him though).  As for mouse, I think she would be less likely to defend anyone else the way she did for Claw here.  I also think she's less likely to punish him even if he does break the rules (maybe I assume too much here?).  I, too, would probably be guilty of something like this if I were an admin and had a close friend on the forum.  I know this isn't an easy job to have, especially when you have people raging against you and also breaking the rules.  Some situations can be tough to judge and we don't realize our mistakes until there is outrage over it.  I just wish the admins would take a more humble stance when dealing with these situations without having to argue and even become upset with one another.  We have one admin who decided to make a decision himself without consulting the others and now we have an admin who decided to take it into their own hands to reverse his decision, again, without consulting the others. This does not seem efficient to me.  When I started posting on this forum, it was a huge mess.  There was a lot of name calling and crying about who isn't doing what and what should be done without anyone taking it into their own hands.  All this does it make us all stagnate here in a negative way and nothing gets done.  I felt that the fact that I took a positive outlook and didn't give into such negative thinking calmed things down from that time.  Those wielding any power here should take a more humble approach and have tough skin.  Giving into the members of the forum who resort to name calling by responding to them with hostility is not the way to go.  I take those members less seriously and the admins less seriously for giving into it

So, as for the situation of Claw using the word "nigger", it looks like it should result in a mute by the one's who are particularly offended judging by the votes in the rules poll.  It's nothing more than just a word.  It's not like he got on here and started ranting in order to offend black people in general or even deliberately directing it toward a black person with it's intended meaning.  Even they use the word freely with one another.  So if someone gets on the forum here and calls someone his "nigga", does that then result in a warning or a ban?  I think not. 

Could we resolve this as adults without resorting to the hostilities?


lol @ everything about this post
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: individualism results in littering on June 17, 2015, 03:10:38 PM
who the fuck writes a post that long about claw, his mom doesn't give him that much attention.
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: Rit on June 17, 2015, 05:18:47 PM
who the fuck writes a post that long about claw, his mom doesn't give him that much attention.

Yeah, I'm guilty of over-analyzing things most of the time.  But I at least realize my brain is a powerhouse and don't reduce myself to simple-minded black & white thinking as well as hit and runs on a forum without offering any explanation, like our friend fuckboi1488:
lol @ everything about this post
Title: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: EviL~Ryu on June 17, 2015, 09:40:36 PM
I have personally taken a liking to Claw because most of his trolling actually makes a lot of logical sense and challenges a lot of flaws in this community.  I feel he is a voice of reason that we need here.  However, I do think he can be a little out there at times.  I don't think that's the case in this situation though. 

I'm not here to make enemies but I really think the admins could be handling themselves a lot better than they are here.  It seems blid likes to take things into his own hands and only consider his own view most of the time to make decisions with a disregard for the actual rules and punishments (I do think he resolved the Evil~Ryu bot situation well after talking with him though).  As for mouse, I think she would be less likely to defend anyone else the way she did for Claw here.  I also think she's less likely to punish him even if he does break the rules (maybe I assume too much here?).  I, too, would probably be guilty of something like this if I were an admin and had a close friend on the forum.  I know this isn't an easy job to have, especially when you have people raging against you and also breaking the rules.  Some situations can be tough to judge and we don't realize our mistakes until there is outrage over it.  I just wish the admins would take a more humble stance when dealing with these situations without having to argue and even become upset with one another.  We have one admin who decided to make a decision himself without consulting the others and now we have an admin who decided to take it into their own hands to reverse his decision, again, without consulting the others. This does not seem efficient to me.  When I started posting on this forum, it was a huge mess.  There was a lot of name calling and crying about who isn't doing what and what should be done without anyone taking it into their own hands.  All this does it make us all stagnate here in a negative way and nothing gets done.  I felt that the fact that I took a positive outlook and didn't give into such negative thinking calmed things down from that time.  Those wielding any power here should take a more humble approach and have tough skin.  Giving into the members of the forum who resort to name calling by responding to them with hostility is not the way to go.  I take those members less seriously and the admins less seriously for giving into it

So, as for the situation of Claw using the word "nigger", it looks like it should result in a mute by the one's who are particularly offended judging by the votes in the rules poll.  It's nothing more than just a word.  It's not like he got on here and started ranting in order to offend black people in general or even deliberately directing it toward a black person with it's intended meaning.  Even they use the word freely with one another.  So if someone gets on the forum here and calls someone his "nigga", does that then result in a warning or a ban?  I think not. 

Could we resolve this as adults without resorting to the hostilities?


lol @ everything about this post


Lmao the pink power ranger is making fun of others...


To answer your question Rit, yes me and blid worked it out after talking.


Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: CumSavorer4385 on June 18, 2015, 06:53:38 PM
who the fuck writes a post that long about claw, his mom doesn't give him that much attention.

Yeah, I'm guilty of over-analyzing things most of the time.  But I at least realize my brain is a powerhouse and don't reduce myself to simple-minded black & white thinking as well as hit and runs on a forum without offering any explanation, like our friend fuckboi1488:
lol @ everything about this post


I was just commenting on how hilarious it was to me that someone would write that much about this stupid forum and also defend claw's retarded racist ass. I'm sorry if I have revealed myself to be a lowbrow no-class lout by laughing at you taking a Warcraft 2 forum with like a dozen active posters deathly seriously.
Title: Re: Revoke my warning, you stupid mods
Post by: Rit on June 19, 2015, 04:07:49 AM
who the fuck writes a post that long about claw, his mom doesn't give him that much attention.

Yeah, I'm guilty of over-analyzing things most of the time.  But I at least realize my brain is a powerhouse and don't reduce myself to simple-minded black & white thinking as well as hit and runs on a forum without offering any explanation, like our friend fuckboi1488:
lol @ everything about this post


I was just commenting on how hilarious it was to me that someone would write that much about this stupid forum and also defend claw's retarded racist ass. I'm sorry if I have revealed myself to be a lowbrow no-class lout by laughing at you taking a Warcraft 2 forum with like a dozen active posters deathly seriously.

I was in rare form the other day when I responded to your post.  My apologies.  I came off a bit hostile.